Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-07vs CSRC CUTHILLSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Robinson / James Robers vs RANDY SIMONS / Mark Phelan3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesArthur Bachet vs William Stone6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRonald Graham / David Bird vs Michael Herzog / Robert DeVine4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Smith / Greg Schochet vs Joseph Ramharack / Luis Baars6-4, 6-1
2026-06-30vs FHCS PASSMORELost 12
W#1 DoublesArthur Bachet / Ronald Graham vs Brian Priest / Jason Holpuch4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ehrlin / Greg Schochet vs Mark Dale / Gary Bong4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Bird / David Robinson vs Mark Breeding / Kevin Halemartin4-6, 0-6
2026-06-23vs LTFCS DARKLost 13
L#1 DoublesPhil Abello / Ronald Graham vs Brett Matheson / James Gaston5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs Richie Fike2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ehrlin / Brad Stark vs Cederick Dark / John Purcell4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Robinson / David Bird vs Neal Siegel / Stephen Ernst6-2, 6-2
2026-06-16vs CSRC CUTHILLLost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Arthur Bachet vs William Stone / Nate Hopkins4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBrad Stark vs Jeff Kulich6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Ehrlin / James Robers vs Glen Roberts / Mark Phelan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Smith / David Robinson vs RANDY SIMONS / Luis Baars6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-09vs FHCS PASSMOREWon 31
W#1 DoublesArthur Bachet / Daniel Bisanti vs Mark Breeding / Brian Priest6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPhil Abello vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Robinson / Greg Schochet vs Kevin Halemartin / Dale Passmore3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJames Robers / Matthew Ehrlin vs Mark Dale / Jed Johnson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-02vs LTFCS DARKWon 40
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Arthur Bachet vs Chad Spencer / Randall Bourgeois6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGregory Smith vs John Purcell6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Robinson / David Bird vs Brett Matheson / Stephen Ernst7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ehrlin / James Robers vs Neal Siegel / James Gaston7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Daniel Bisanti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Arthur Bachet
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Gregory Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
James Robers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Phil Abello
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Ronald Graham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Greg Schochet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Brad Stark
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
David Bird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Matthew Ehrlin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Greg Schochet5356% games+2.1% vs expected
James Robers + Matthew Ehrlin2340% games−18.8% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Bisanti + Arthur Bachet213 matchesnot enough data
Arthur Bachet + Phil Abello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Bisanti
51W–31L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Arthur Bachet
43W–23L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Gregory Smith
79W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
James Robers
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Ronald Graham
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Greg Schochet
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Brad Stark
3W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
David Bird
4W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Matthew Ehrlin
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.