Teams

IND-Fitzgerald

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-10vs YTC-StephenWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald vs Scott Stephen / Marcie Ehlis3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer vs Timothy Miller / Stacy Stephen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMax Larsen / Kellee Bates vs Jonathan Whiteside / Stephanie Flowers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-09vs PC-Get Em Done In TwoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMax Larsen / Kellee Bates vs Ryan Lieberman / Karen Madsen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer vs Jim Perry / Carrie Perry7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPeter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald vs Eldon Monson / Annette Rose4-6, 3-6
2021-10-09vs CBRC-SamuelWon 30
W#1 DoublesBryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer vs Amy Nguyen / Aleksey Ovchinnikov6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMax Larsen / Kellee Bates vs Janel Bhattacharya / Evan Mehlenbacher6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald vs Diana Titechko / Adam Hrebeniuk6-2, 7-6
2021-10-08vs CBRC-Team JoWon 21
L#1 DoublesBryce Borland / Tiffany Sauer vs Jack Wang / Jolene Boughton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMax Larsen / Kellee Bates vs Scott Dowson / Xia Suter6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Ho / Alyssa Fitzgerald vs Sheng-Lun Tai / Michelle Glenn7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC-Get Em Done In Two401116103
2IND-Fitzgerald3193995
3CBRC-Team Jo226615113
4CBRC-Samuel0401224147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Kellee Bates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Alyssa Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Tiffany Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bryce Borland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Max Larsen
published
Peter Ho
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellee Bates + Bryce Borland5058% gamesnot enough data
Bryce Borland + Tiffany Sauer314 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Fitzgerald + Peter Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellee Bates
103W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Alyssa Fitzgerald
72W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
Tiffany Sauer
34W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Bryce Borland
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Max Larsen
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Peter Ho
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.