Teams

LAL Fall TriLevel Mixed - Tung

2022 WI Other · WI Other Tri Level Delta Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-23vs LAL Fall TriLevel Mixed-JudithWon 10
W#2 DoublesBette Smith / Tim Wisinski vs Jenna Helminski Juve / Eric Rowekamp6-1, 6-3
2022-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesStanton Loh / Adrienne Loh vs John Aschenbrenner / Mary Aschenbrenner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Loh / Kyle Jensen vs Judith Engen / Andrew Seithamer2-6, 0-6
2022-09-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Wisinski / Kacey Nomland vs Dillon Eddingsaas / Christine Kahlow6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-18vs LAL Fall TriLevel Mixed - BrettWon 20
W#2 DoublesBette Smith / Tim Wisinski vs Lewis Kuhlman / Sarah Wengerter6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Loh / Stanton Loh vs Peter Waltz / Kristine Bartley6-2, 6-3
2022-09-11vs LAL Fall TriLevel Mixed-JudithWon 10
W#2 DoublesKacey Nomland / Randall Moseng vs Jenna Helminski Juve / Eric Rowekamp7-5, 6-3
2022-08-28vs LAL Fall TriLevel Mixed - RoxieWon 10
W#3 DoublesStanton Loh / Jennifer Carr vs Sean O'Flaherty / Sarah Siegler6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Other Tri Level Delta Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bette Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Adrienne Loh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacob Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Carr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kacey Nomland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Reutlinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randall Moseng
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Stanton Loh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Wisinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tung Ouy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bette Smith + Tim Wisinski9556% gamesnot enough data
Stanton Loh + Adrienne Loh9555% gamesnot enough data
Jacob Schafer + Laura Reutlinger3352% gamesnot enough data
Tung Ouy + Laura Reutlinger3349% gamesnot enough data
Bette Smith + Kacey Nomland5085% gamesnot enough data
Bette Smith + Jennifer Carr404 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Nomland + Tim Wisinski314 matchesnot enough data
Bette Smith + Tung Ouy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bette Smith
65W–43L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Adrienne Loh
35W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
3.17
Jacob Schafer
23W–21L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Carr
63W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kacey Nomland
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle Jensen
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Reutlinger
53W–21L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randall Moseng
38W–37L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stanton Loh
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Wisinski
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tung Ouy
110W–37L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.