Teams

BRY: Steere/McEldowney

2025 RI Adult 65 & Over Men · 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-03vs EH: ReinerWon 20
W#1 DoublesGary McEldowney / Kari Juusela vs Jeremy Greshin / ERIC LEVINE6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRussell Steere / Robert ODonnell vs Mike Reiner / Ken Dorros6-2, 6-3
2025-09-03vs EH: ReinerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSamuel Richards / Richard Boyce vs Larry Hutnick / Kenneth Landy4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobert ODonnell / Russell Steere vs Jeremy Greshin / Ken Dorros6-4, 6-4
2025-08-17vs EH: ReinerWon 30
W#1 DoublesGary McEldowney / Kari Juusela vs Ken Dorros / Larry Hutnick6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRobert ODonnell / Bruce Ogilvie vs ERIC LEVINE / Jeremy Greshin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Gay / Samuel Richards vs Mike Reiner / David Anderson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-17vs EH: ReinerWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert ODonnell / Russell Steere vs Mike Reiner / Tod Robberson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGary McEldowney / Joshua Bell vs ERIC LEVINE / Jeremy Greshin6-2, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Boyce / Kari Juusela vs Ken Dorros / Larry Hutnick6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Ogilvie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Robert Gay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gary McEldowney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joshua Bell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kari Juusela
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Robert ODonnell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Russell Steere
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Samuel Richards
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Richards + Richard Boyce3253% gamesnot enough data
Gary McEldowney + Joshua Bell314 matchesnot enough data
Samuel Richards + Robert Gay303 matchesnot enough data
Samuel Richards + Joshua Bell303 matchesnot enough data
Russell Steere + Joshua Bell213 matchesnot enough data
Russell Steere + Robert ODonnell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Ogilvie
4W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Gay
55W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Gary McEldowney
55W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Bell
75W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kari Juusela
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Boyce
13W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert ODonnell
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Russell Steere
32W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Richards
28W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.