Teams

Boyd/Whealdon/18/2.5/CWN/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-15vs Nickels/Mayfield/18/2.5/CWN/CPWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarneda Milhiser / Mary Letsch vs Alexis Miranne / Lindsay Legrand6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlita Caparotta / Natalie John vs Sofia Martinez / Gabriel Virdure6-4, 6-1
2025-10-06vs Cole/18/2.5/CWN/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa York / Marneda Milhiser vs Sydnie Cole / Amelia Hurt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Aucoin / Cynthia Hodnett vs Erin Haik / Amory Levert4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMari Krane / Jill Maumus vs Niquette Kearney / Sara James1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs Perino Reardon/18/2.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarneda Milhiser / Emily Brown vs Alex Veazey / Emma Kennedy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Deynoodt / Mary Letsch vs Kendall Dunn / Brittany Martin2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlita Caparotta / Jill Maumus vs Marcella Perino / Kayla Smith5-7, 0-6
2025-09-08vs Nickels/Mayfield/18/2.5/CWN/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarneda Milhiser / Emily Brown vs Miko Futagoishi / Camille Russ6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMari Krane / Jill Maumus vs Gabriel Virdure / Alexis Miranne6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie John / Elizabeth St John vs Lorenza Mercante / Adriana Garcia6-2, 6-2
2025-08-25vs Perino Reardon/18/2.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarneda Milhiser / Elizabeth St John vs Marcella Perino / Kayla Smith1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Aucoin / Mary Letsch vs Sara Reardon / Alex Veazey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMari Krane / Jill Maumus vs Rachael Kansas / Ashley Ezell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-19vs Cole/18/2.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Boyd / Alita Caparotta vs Niquette Kearney / Sarah Malone0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Deynoodt / Mary Letsch vs Sara James / Erin Haik3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMari Krane / Jill Maumus vs Sydnie Cole / Amelia Hurt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Natalie John
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Elizabeth Boyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Marneda Milhiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Elizabeth St John
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Cynthia Hodnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Mari Krane
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.17
Alita Caparotta
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Mary Letsch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.08
Mary Deynoodt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Melissa Aucoin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Jill Maumus
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Melissa York
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stefani Celio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mari Krane + Jill Maumus2543% games−0.8% vs expected
Mary Deynoodt + Mary Letsch2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie John
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Elizabeth Boyd
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Marneda Milhiser
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
Elizabeth St John
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Cynthia Hodnett
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mari Krane
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Alita Caparotta
8W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Mary Letsch
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Mary Deynoodt
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melissa Aucoin
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jill Maumus
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Melissa York
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stefani Celio
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.