Teams

Gifford/JB/JCC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-11vs Cobern/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#1 SinglesMallory Hurst vs Renee Cobern6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSarah Gifford vs Karla Nortier6-1, 6-0
2024-12-03vs Daniel/JB/3OaksSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKirby Smith vs Hannah Agudelo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMallory Hurst vs Stephanie Romero6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-26vs Cobern/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 SinglesAlley Bell vs Kamri Herndon4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKirby Smith vs Renee Cobern6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesSarah Gifford vs Sarah Milton5-7, 3-6
2024-11-20vs Gill/JB/APLost 12
W#1 SinglesMallory Hurst vs Ashlee Gill6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKirby Smith vs Meghan Scott4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJordan Powell vs Elizabeth Cox2-6, 1-6
2024-11-18vs Parker/JB/APLost 03
L#1 SinglesKirby Smith vs Abby Rogers1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMallory Hurst vs Crys Cook6-1, 0-3
L#3 SinglesCourtney Watkins vs Paige Parnell0-6, 2-6
2024-11-12vs Gill/JB/APLost 12
L#1 SinglesTaylor Kaloghirou vs Ashlee Gill2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlexandra Kosmitis vs Elizabeth Cox5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAlley Bell vs Paige Cox6-7, 4-6
2024-11-04vs Daniel/JB/3OaksWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Kosmitis vs Morgan Davis-Daniel7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKirby Smith vs Sarah Newbern7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTaylor Kaloghirou vs Lindi Wade2-6, 3-6
2024-10-21vs Parker/JB/APWon 21
L#1 SinglesSarah Gifford vs Jordan Adams0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAlley Bell vs Autumn Eastep7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAlexandra Kosmitis vs Crys Cook6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Mallory Hurst
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.03
Alexandra Kosmitis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.93
Sarah Gifford
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.92
Alley Bell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Courtney Watkins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Jordan Powell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Taylor Kaloghirou
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kirby Smith
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Hurst
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Alexandra Kosmitis
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Sarah Gifford
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Alley Bell
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Courtney Watkins
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Jordan Powell
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Taylor Kaloghirou
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Kirby Smith
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.