Teams

Biloxi - Foley

2025 Adult 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-10vs BBTC - DawkinsWon 50
W#1 DoublesMichelle Foley / Lisa Mabry Smith vs Trinity Henn / Audry Bush7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKarah Brown vs Jackie Orgler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDianne Holloway / Mary Ann Strickland vs Kathryn Plott / Cory Brainard6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLynsie Battles vs Samantha Mitchell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanna Day / Nicole Montagnet vs Linda Benigno / Kathleen Fitzgerald6-0, 6-2
2025-03-31vs BBTC - JuraszekWon 50
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Strickland / Nicole Montagnet vs Allison Ward / Amber Juraszek6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKarah Brown vs Tana Cooper5-7, 2-0
W#2 DoublesDianne Holloway / Laura Marcel vs Amanda Letonoff / Hollie Miller6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJane Ardito vs Carly Nichols Coy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanna Day / Lynette Cooper vs Angie Simmons / Shelly Williams6-4, 6-4
2025-03-24vs BBTC - DawkinsWon 50
W#1 DoublesJane Ardito / Lynette Cooper vs Missy Descher / Rebecca Mayfield6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAndrea May vs Gloria Doty6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanna Day / Julie West vs Kathryn Plott / Linda Benigno7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Kathleen Fitzgerald6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Foley / Lynsie Battles vs Jackie Orgler / Samantha Mitchell6-1, 6-0
2025-03-20vs BBTC - JuraszekWon 41
W#1 DoublesDanna Day / Julie West vs Ellen Taylor / Allison Ward5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Montagnet vs Carly Nichols Coy1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLynette Cooper / Lisa Mabry Smith vs Shelly Williams / Angie Simmons6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Amber Juraszek7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDianne Holloway / Laura Marcel vs Regan Foster / Paula Moore7-5, 6-1
2025-03-10vs BBTC - JuraszekWon 41
W#1 DoublesDanna Day / Julie West vs Angie Simmons / Paula Moore6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndrea May vs Tana Cooper1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJane Ardito / Laura Marcel vs Hollie Miller / Amber Juraszek6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Ellen Taylor6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynette Cooper / Dianne Holloway vs Shelly Williams / Frances Vance6-1, 6-2
2025-02-24vs BBTC - DawkinsWon 40
W#1 DoublesLynette Cooper / Dianne Holloway vs Missy Descher / Tamara Moody6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea May vs Rebecca Mayfield6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanna Day / Julie West vs Paulette Dawkins / Audry Bush6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Ardito / Laura Marcel vs Linda Benigno / Kathleen Fitzgerald7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lisa Mabry Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Dianne Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Mary Ann Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Jane Ardito
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Danna Day
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Karah Brown
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Andrea May
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kelsey Martin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Nicole Montagnet
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Lynette Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Lynsie Battles
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Laura Marcel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Foley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Holloway + Lynette Cooper18169% games+7.9% vs expected
Mary Ann Strickland + Nicole Montagnet314 matchesnot enough data
Danna Day + Jane Ardito314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea May + Lynsie Battles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Mabry Smith
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Dianne Holloway
49W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Mary Ann Strickland
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jane Ardito
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Danna Day
24W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Karah Brown
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Andrea May
36W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Kelsey Martin
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Nicole Montagnet
38W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Lynette Cooper
42W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Lynsie Battles
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Laura Marcel
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Foley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.