Teams

SMASH

2024 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-10vs Volley StarzLost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrea Navarro / Beth Goetz vs Kay Brezny / Brenda Hise3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathy Mansell vs Tiny Phan1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathie Strickler / Kim Teter vs Cindy Hendrick / Tina Stong4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaty Miller vs Srividhya Muralidharan4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTeddi Roy / Debbie Bray vs Jill Raines / Tina Morehart4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-13vs OverservedLost 23
L#1 DoublesTeddi Roy / Beth Goetz vs Whitney Rainbolt / Amber Vawter2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKathy Mansell vs Natalie Simon6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRouye Choquette / Jan Foisy vs Maggie Humphreys / Kari Clifford4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKaty Miller vs Heather Ross4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSUSAN LOBSINGER / Alisa Stewart vs Mindy Bryant / Dana Schwab6-4, 6-3
2024-04-22vs Kiss My AceLost 14
L#1 DoublesBeth Goetz / Teddi Roy vs Lauren Moore / Gamage Dilini Perera7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaty Miller vs Katrina Giron4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Foisy / Alisa Stewart vs Tammy Gill / Brittany McKnight1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKathy Mansell vs Lisa Nguyen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Blanchard / Debbie Bray vs Diane Pound / Elizabeth McCrackin4-6, 3-6
2024-04-15vs MoValley/Madden/18&over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesAndrea Navarro / Natalia Smith vs Lucia Chavez / Kim Lewis4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKathie Strickler vs Sarah Patel1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Foisy / Kim Teter vs Irene Jones / Amy High5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKathy Mansell vs Casey Gonzalez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeddi Roy / Debbie Bray vs Wendy Madden / Avilone Doan2-6, 1-6
2024-04-08vs TD Academy 3.5Won 41
W#1 DoublesKathie Strickler / Natalia Smith vs Terri Nevin-Hesselroth / Erin McClelland6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathy Mansell vs Liz Adams6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSUSAN LOBSINGER / Kim Teter vs Erica Martinez / Susan Bouzerand7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKaty Miller vs Leslie Robinson5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRouye Choquette / Alisa Stewart vs Nancy Flaherty / Dana Rex6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Natalia Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Bray
published 3.5
3.19
Beth Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Kathy Mansell
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #2 Singles 42% · published
3.10
Kim Teter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jan Foisy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kathie Strickler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Rouye Choquette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Andrea Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Alisa Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Katy Miller
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 39% · published
2.51
SUSAN LOBSINGER
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Leslie Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teddi Roy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Strickler + Andrea Navarro4161% games+8.9% vs expected
Beth Goetz + Andrea Navarro4354% games+5.6% vs expected
Jan Foisy + Kathy Mansell11361% games+4.2% vs expected
SUSAN LOBSINGER + Katy Miller1439% games+2.6% vs expected
Kim Teter + Alisa Stewart1741% games+2.0% vs expected
Kathie Strickler + Jan Foisy81051% games+0.6% vs expected
Rouye Choquette + Jan Foisy141052% games+0.3% vs expected
Kathie Strickler + Kathy Mansell2351% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Smith
55W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Bray
27W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Beth Goetz
45W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Kathy Mansell
99W–82L career · 12 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kim Teter
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jan Foisy
49W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kathie Strickler
42W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Rouye Choquette
31W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.86
3
Andrea Navarro
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alisa Stewart
45W–73L career · 6 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Katy Miller
23W–39L career · 12 lines in 2024
0%27%73%
2.59
SUSAN LOBSINGER
67W–103L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
Leslie Blanchard
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Teddi Roy
62W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.