Teams

David Park - Incredibelles

2023 Broward Adult 40 & Over Day · 4.0 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-16vs KoonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Amy DeLoach vs Isabel Casellas / Julie Jurman1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Gricel Boto Bernales3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLorena Villar / Edith Schmidt vs Kathy Koon / Christine Holcomb5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Kaplan / Paulina Carney vs Elisabeth Weiss / NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA6-0, 6-1
2023-03-09vs Wrc - LandLost 12
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Ivy Touchstone3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Mendelson / Lee Lynott vs Catherine Land / Upasna Jha0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Marta Barreiro Meiro vs Stacy Solano / Clarena Furtado6-2, 6-0
2023-03-02vs Veltri - NickosonWon 30
W#1 DoublesTatiana Roosli / Mirella Sprinckmoller vs Angelica Baez / Rossitza Anguelova-Szabo6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Lorena Villar vs Yonghong Chen / ELIZABETH GORDILLO6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele King / Svetlana Janglin vs Sarah Nickoson / Maria Moreno4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-16vs Wrc - LandLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy DeLoach / Lori Kaplan vs Marianne Rivas / Noelia Diaz7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichele King / Lee Lynott vs Stacy Solano / Gabriella Vayshelboym1-6, 6-7
2023-02-09vs Veltri - NickosonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Mariola Idrobo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaulina Carney / Katherine Shadid vs Evelyn Daniels / Ana Carolina Manchester6-3, 6-2
2023-02-02vs KoonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Paulina Carney vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Lori Schlam4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Kaplan / Karen Ellis vs Gloria Coursey / Estefania Lacoa0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Amy DeLoach vs Kathy Koon / Christine Holcomb6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-26vs Wrc - LandWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Lorena Villar vs Maria Montoto / Raiza Matheus6-1, 6-4
2023-01-19vs Veltri - NickosonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Kaplan / Paulina Carney vs Maria Moreno / Rossitza Anguelova-Szabo6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Yonghong Chen2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLoren Levine / Laura Mendelson vs Maria Galvan Leeper / Evelyn Daniels6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-12vs KoonWon 21
W#1 DoublesEdith Schmidt / Lorena Villar vs Meredith Novak / Gricel Boto Bernales6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Paulina Carney vs Gloria Coursey / Zorayda Hidalgo2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Ellis / Svetlana Janglin vs Kathy Koon / Christine Holcomb6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Paulina Carney
published
4.03
Michele King
published
3.91
Edith Schmidt
published 4
3.89
Lori Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Karen Ellis
published
3.85
Amy DeLoach
published 4
3.79
Lorena Villar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Mirella Sprinckmoller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Laura Mendelson
published
3.70
Loren Levine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Carla Martin
published 4
3.29
Lee Lynott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tatiana Roosli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mirella Sprinckmoller + Edith Schmidt6060% games+6.6% vs expected
Loren Levine + Edith Schmidt6357% games−3.2% vs expected
Katherine Shadid + Mirella Sprinckmoller3256% gamesnot enough data
Loren Levine + Mirella Sprinckmoller2351% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Shadid + Lori Kaplan303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Kaplan + Loren Levine303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Kaplan + Edith Schmidt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulina Carney
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Edith Schmidt
52W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Lori Kaplan
139W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Karen Ellis
104W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Amy DeLoach
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Mirella Sprinckmoller
76W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Laura Mendelson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carla Martin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
Lee Lynott
80W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Tatiana Roosli
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.