Teams

ALACHUA/Schafer/40&Over3.5M

2023 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-28vs WS - LaiWon 10
W#1 SinglesDan Weisman vs Don Baik6-3, 6-2
2023-05-18vs WS - Spink/FergusonWon 10
W#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Ed Stark vs Enrique Vargas / Thomas Yonge6-4, 6-3
2023-05-05vs WS - BradyLost 01
L#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Dan Weisman vs Paul Askew / Christopher Bumgarner6-4, 1-1
2023-04-30vs WS - Spink/FergusonWon 20
W#2 DoublesChad Schafer / Dan Weisman vs Josh Spink / Nathan Wycoff6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEd Stark / Jerry Lu vs Timothy Ferguson / Keith Myers6-3, 6-4
2023-04-20vs WS - LaiWon 20
W#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Dan Weisman vs Markus Schneider / Guanghua Yan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Michael Tooke vs Mark Diblin / Jian Pu7-5, 6-4
2023-04-15vs WS - BradyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Chad Schafer vs Erik Bredfeldt / Christopher Bumgarner6-2, 6-1
2023-04-06vs WS - Spink/FergusonWon 20
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Dan Weisman vs Camilo Fita / Josh Spink6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCory Hanson / Chad Schafer vs Jim Severance / Brent Sumerlin6-3, 6-3
2023-04-01vs WS - LaiWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Weisman / William Haveman vs Scott Thompson / Xiaoping Zhang6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerry Lu / Ed Stark vs Kevin Smith / Jorg Bungert6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Dan Weisman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Boris Kuchuk
published 4
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
William Haveman
published
3.38
Ed Stark
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.33
Marko Suvajdzic
published
2.92
Brian Shenker
published 3.5
Scott Rowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Schafer + Ed Stark8263% gamesnot enough data
Dan Weisman + Chad Schafer5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Weisman
85W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Boris Kuchuk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
William Haveman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.41
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marko Suvajdzic
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Brian Shenker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
Malcolm H Waldron III
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.