Teams

Fitlite

2024 Adult 18 & Over-SW · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-16vs DouchardLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Melton / Stephanie Page vs Brandi Leggett / Rebecca Carter1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTaylor Key vs Betsy Virginia Daughdrill6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdrianne Weekley / Amy Holmes vs Stacy Douchard / Stacey Lambert6-4
2024-05-05vs KillenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeidre BREWER / Kala Edmonds vs Ashlyn Gatlin / Kelly Fenwick6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTaylor Key vs JENNA NELSON6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Melton / Adrianne Weekley vs Andrea Barry / Darby Freeman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-16vs KillenWon 21
W#1 DoublesTaylor Key / Amy Holmes vs Kelly Fenwick / Ashlyn Gatlin6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDeidre BREWER vs Layne Xifos2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdrianne Weekley / Robin Melton vs Jessica Killen / Lindy Sills6-2, 6-3
2024-04-14vs KillenWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaylor Key / Stephanie Page vs Sara Summers Norton / Darby Freeman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKala Edmonds / Adrianne Weekley vs Kelly Fenwick / Lindy Sills6-0, 6-0
2024-03-19vs DouchardLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeidre BREWER / Stephanie Page vs Brandi Leggett / Rebecca Carter1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTaylor Key vs Stacey Lambert6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Williams / Robin Melton vs Stacy Douchard / Betsy Virginia Daughdrill4-6, 2-6
2024-02-25vs DouchardSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKala Edmonds vs Brandi Leggett1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Melton / Adrianne Weekley vs Stacy Douchard / Stacey Lambert6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fitlite4212615115
2Killen0621634208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adrianne Weekley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Deidre BREWER
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Kala Edmonds
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robin Melton
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Taylor Key
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre BREWER + Adrianne Weekley033 matchesnot enough data
Adrianne Weekley + Robin Melton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Adrianne Weekley
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Deidre BREWER
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kala Edmonds
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Melton
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Taylor Key
24W–7L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.