Teams

LJSZ-Szilagyi-Jetton

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 8.5 Women 40s

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14vs LLDU-Dunn/Jetton 8.5 40Won 21
W#1 DoublesLori Woods / Julie Mudge vs Sarah Hoglund / Bridget Castoria7-6, 2-4
W#2 DoublesSachi Denny / Phebby Benton vs Kristin Davis / Linda Radovich6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Lori Scherrman vs Annie Perrino / Margaret Gilmore2-6, 2-6
2025-10-13vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Rowe / Debbie Newman vs Traci Dudan / Jennifer Schreck6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFelicia Dean / Ming Keadle vs Frances Daymude / Naila Campbell6-0, 6-3
2025-10-11vs LJPA-Patterson/CSD SpartanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Kennedy / Lori Scherrman vs Kelly Kennard / Donna Upchurch6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Potuzak / Dawn Jennings vs Jennifer Jenkins / Elizabeth Mangano6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJulie Mudge / Felicia Dean vs Nancy Zylstra / Martha Wells6-4, 6-2
2025-09-22vs LCSW-Swanson-Milligan/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Woods / Julie Mudge vs Robin Dann / Cheryl Woodruff7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDawn Jennings / Phebby Benton vs Brenda Levy / Leslie Gimbel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Scherrman / Janet Szilagyi vs Stacy Agar / Leila Riccardelli3-6, 3-6
2025-09-15vs LJPA-Patterson/CSD SpartanWon 21
W#1 DoublesSachi Denny / Phebby Benton vs Jennie Carruth / Donna Upchurch6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCourtney Rowe / Ming Keadle vs Elizabeth Mangano / Lisa Moyer6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Jennings / Janet Marek vs Jodi Patterson / Martha Wells6-0, 6-2
2025-09-08vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesFelicia Dean / Ming Keadle vs Lauren Hession / Jenny Yaudes6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSachi Denny / Phebby Benton vs Andrea McRorie / Allison Terry6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Rowe / Debbie Newman vs Frances Daymude / Naila Campbell6-2, 7-6
2025-08-25vs LLDU-Dunn/Jetton 8.5 40Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMing Keadle / Janet Marek vs Bridget Castoria / Sarah Hoglund2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Woods / Julie Mudge vs Margaret Gilmore / Danielle Delancey2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Scherrman / Debbie Newman vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Jill Hulse-Mack7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-18vs LCSW-Swanson-Milligan/WestportWon 20
W#2 DoublesSachi Denny / Mary Kennedy vs Renee Fleishman / Becky Heflin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFelicia Dean / Janet Szilagyi vs Leslie Gimbel / Kathleen Milligan6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Lori Scherrman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Woods
published
4.25
Melanie Lewis
published
4.20
Felicia Dean
published
4.18
Courtney Rowe
published 4.5
4.18
Sachi Denny
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.15
Dawn Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Michelle Potuzak
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.82
Janet Szilagyi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Janet Marek
published
3.78
Ming Keadle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Phebby Benton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Julie Mudge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Debbie Newman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Potuzak + Debbie Newman6655% games+8.4% vs expected
Sachi Denny + Phebby Benton9164% games−0.8% vs expected
Lori Scherrman + Janet Szilagyi6553% gamesnot enough data
Sachi Denny + Janet Szilagyi8261% gamesnot enough data
Lori Scherrman + Julie Mudge4450% gamesnot enough data
Lori Scherrman + Ming Keadle3551% gamesnot enough data
Julie Mudge + Michelle Potuzak3457% gamesnot enough data
Lori Scherrman + Sachi Denny5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lori Scherrman
133W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Lori Woods
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Melanie Lewis
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Felicia Dean
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Courtney Rowe
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Sachi Denny
145W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Dawn Jennings
209W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
4
Michelle Potuzak
150W–116L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Janet Marek
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
Ming Keadle
110W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Phebby Benton
170W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Julie Mudge
102W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Debbie Newman
67W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.