Teams

KCC70+

2024 Legends League (Spring) · 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-13vs 70 is the New 30Won 10
W#2 DoublesJames Hatashima / Rodney Koizumi vs Leighton Fong / Gil Bueno6-4, 6-4
2024-03-12vs Elderly DucksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndres Libed / Al Moy vs Bruce Ladeira / Glenn Fujitani7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDanny Kato / Charles Kishimoto vs Fung Eng / Eric Hara3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-02-21vs 70 is the New 30Split 11
L#1 DoublesRodney Koizumi / James Hatashima vs Koji Miki / Milton Nitta0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDanny Kato / Al Moy vs Leighton Fong / Chris Wickham6-4, 6-0
2024-02-14vs Elderly DucksWon 21
L#1 DoublesRodney Koizumi / Derrick Tsukayama vs Bruce Ladeira / Glenn Fujitani6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Fong / Al Moy vs Stan Nakama / Daniel Nomi6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndres Libed / Alvin Yamamoto vs Howard Co / Eric Hara6-2, 6-4
2024-01-31vs 70 is the New 30Won 20
W#2 DoublesJames Kobashigawa / Charles Kishimoto vs John Laslo / Jay Hayden6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRodney Koizumi / James Hatashima vs Bernie Duarte / Lyle Smith6-3, 6-3
2024-01-24vs Elderly DucksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAl Moy / Charles Kishimoto vs Bruce Ladeira / Glenn Fujitani2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndres Libed / Alvin Yamamoto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Andres Libed
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Rodney Koizumi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Al Moy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
2.65
Charles Kishimoto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Derrick Tsukayama
published 2.5
Richard Fong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Al Moy + Andres Libed10170% gamesnot enough data
Charles Kishimoto + Al Moy224 matchesnot enough data
Charles Kishimoto + Andres Libed303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andres Libed
43W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Rodney Koizumi
48W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Al Moy
48W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
James Kobashigawa
33W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Charles Kishimoto
72W–116L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
2.5
Derrick Tsukayama
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Fong
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.