Teams

deleted women

2022 Adult 18 and Over League · Refund

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / MAUI

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Ruby Matsui
published 4
Amy Reisenauer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Cynthia Funai
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Gage Beerer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Liezl Lao
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.60
Jeanne Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kandy Grantz
published 4
3.57
Marisa Fujimoto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.38
Lori Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Clarita Balala
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Leslie Wilshusen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kaia Udell
published
Stacie Thorlakson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Funai + Marisa Fujimoto3552% games+2.5% vs expected
Leslie Wilshusen + Liezl Lao3736% games−1.0% vs expected
Gage Beerer + Marisa Fujimoto4353% games−3.0% vs expected
Kandy Grantz + Gage Beerer7552% games−3.1% vs expected
Lori Tanaka + Marisa Fujimoto131651% games−3.5% vs expected
Gage Beerer + Lori Tanaka0741% games−8.9% vs expected
Clarita Balala + Lori Tanaka5256% gamesnot enough data
Kandy Grantz + Lori Tanaka134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruby Matsui
55W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
4.04
4
Amy Reisenauer
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cynthia Funai
93W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Gage Beerer
83W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Liezl Lao
42W–129L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jeanne Dunn
46W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Kandy Grantz
76W–65L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Marisa Fujimoto
119W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Lori Tanaka
87W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Clarita Balala
118W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Leslie Wilshusen
46W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Kaia Udell
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacie Thorlakson
40W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.