Teams

LA - Team FEDAL

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-01vs LA - Primetime DivasWon 10
W#2 DoublesTamra Loeb / Melanie Truhett vs Kelly Nielson / Stacie Smiley6-2, 7-5
2024-11-16vs LA - Serves You RightWon 20
W#1 DoublesTamra Loeb / Nicole Winslow vs Ahdeyh Soltani / Xiaozhen Yuan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Isaacson / Rumduol Vuong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-03vs LA - Network StarsLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicole Park / Nicole Winslow vs Lisa Inomata-O'Connell / Julieta Moure3-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs LA - I'd Hit ThatLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Flygare / Rumduol Vuong vs Tracy Dickerson / Stacy Sarner7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-10-13vs LA - Racquet ScientistsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamra Loeb / Melanie Truhett vs Deborah Destler / Cindy Gaytan6-3, 6-0
2024-10-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Flygare / Nicole Winslow vs Tracy Berger / Jenny Bicks6-3, 6-0
2024-09-28vs LA-LLW-Kiss My Ace-Sona ArutyunyanLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelanie Truhett / Julie Flygare vs Myrna Castanon / Kate Horiuchi4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Bruyninx / Nicole Winslow vs Carrie Zerling / Sona Arutyunyan6-7, 1-6
2024-09-15vs LA - T-BirdsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTamra Loeb / Melanie Truhett vs Nickie Huai / Holly Lieberenz7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicole Park / Rumduol Vuong vs Karen Vidal / Gloria Ziperovich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Julie Flygare
published
3.68
Jenny Isaacson
published
3.60
Nicole Winslow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Tamra Loeb
published
3.59
Melanie Truhett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Rumduol Vuong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Lucy OKeeffe
published 3.5
Nancy Bruyninx
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamra Loeb + Melanie Truhett11654% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
Jenny Isaacson
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Nicole Winslow
44W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tamra Loeb
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
4
Melanie Truhett
125W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Lucy OKeeffe
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Nancy Bruyninx
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.