Teams

Cox

2023 Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over · Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs Savino/HalterLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Elizabeth Peterson vs Michella Newton / Courtney Kellam6-7, 4-6
2023-07-11vs NewtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Long / Beth Kulas vs Rebecca Newton / Marcela Anongos7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Faye Downey vs Dina Day-Uhlir / Kate Wester6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-27vs Savino/HalterLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Brashear / Alyse Chickey vs Grayson Kellam / Tessa Robinson6-7, 4-6
2023-06-20vs NewtonWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Elizabeth Peterson vs Helen Miller / Kate Wester6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Perry DiBona vs Rebecca Newton / Kimberly Cummings6-2, 6-4
2023-06-13vs CamdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Beth Skolnick vs Betty Domanski / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.61
Alyse Chickey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Cory Dunn
published 3.5
3.49
Elizabeth Peterson
published
3.35
Beth Skolnick
published 3.5
3.28
Beth Kulas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Janet Brashear
published
3.13
Jenna DeLigio
published
2.80
Faye Downey
published
Elizabeth Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Chickey + Elizabeth Peterson7654% games+3.0% vs expected
Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Alyse Chickey
97W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Cory Dunn
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Elizabeth Peterson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jenna DeLigio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Faye Downey
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
Elizabeth Long
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.