Teams

TCT:Blue:Coorssen

2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men - 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-24vs CP:Harpoons:FrankWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Coorssen / Jeffrey Brozek vs Andrew Frank / Gregory Vadasdi4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Groves / Adrian Louw vs Rene del Portillo / Hermann Behrens6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJuan Amador / Ross Raggio vs Jeffrey Peterson / Peter Chavez6-3, 6-1
2022-06-20vs NC:Net Assets:MuellerLost 12
W#1 SinglesJoshua Heilweil vs Otar Taktakishvili3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJuan Amador / Paul Groves vs David Amendola / Zachary Amendola2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoss Raggio / Steven Lubchansky vs Rambabu Vallabhajosula / Ted Keating2-6, 3-6
2022-05-23vs SOL:Joker's Wild:Spenner/HowardSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPaul Coorssen / Carlos Riollano vs Phillip Rehg / Peter Shields3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoshua Heilweil vs Jared Gans6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRick Lopez / Neeraj Mehta vs Zack Stone / Brian Hawe3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Groves / Adrian Louw vs Craig Spenner / Thomas Moellering6-2, 6-2
2022-05-15vs CP:Harpoons:FrankWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Coorssen / Alan Pouyat vs Gregory Vadasdi / Andrew Frank6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJoshua Heilweil vs Rene del Portillo7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGregory Francis / Rick Lopez vs Peter Chavez / Jeffrey Peterson6-1, 7-6
2022-05-06vs SOL:Joker's Wild:Spenner/HowardWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdrian Louw / Alan Pouyat vs Brian Hawe / Jared Gans6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoshua Heilweil vs Nico VandeWoestijne6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJuan Amador / Carlos Riollano vs Craig Spenner / Michael Boehme4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-29vs NC:Net Assets:MuellerWon 31
W#1 DoublesAdrian Louw / Alan Pouyat vs Michael Mueller / Liam Berkowitz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJason Walder vs Rambabu Vallabhajosula6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Brozek / Paul Coorssen vs Russell Thaler / Colby Catania5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNeeraj Mehta / Juan Amador vs Alfred Culliford / Robert Mitchell6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men - 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jeffrey Brozek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Adrian Louw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Carlos Riollano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Gregory Francis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Alan Pouyat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Walder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
John Pagano
published
Joshua Heilweil
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Juan Amador
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Neeraj Mehta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Coorssen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Paul Groves
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rick Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Raggio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Lubchansky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Louw + Rick Lopez5066% games+14.2% vs expected
Alan Pouyat + Adrian Louw4648% games+2.3% vs expected
Alan Pouyat + Rick Lopez7259% games+1.5% vs expected
Paul Groves + Juan Amador4257% games−1.1% vs expected
Steven Lubchansky + Ross Raggio134 matchesnot enough data
Neeraj Mehta + Rick Lopez224 matchesnot enough data
Adrian Louw + Jeffrey Brozek404 matchesnot enough data
Steven Lubchansky + Rick Lopez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Brozek
95W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Adrian Louw
35W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Riollano
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gregory Francis
40W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Alan Pouyat
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Walder
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
John Pagano
24W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Heilweil
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Juan Amador
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Neeraj Mehta
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Coorssen
25W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Groves
27W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Lopez
35W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ross Raggio
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Lubchansky
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.