Teams

MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Women 5.0

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-25vs Gadsky homeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gadsky / Sampada Coster vs Adela Finerty / Beatriz Juan Miranzo6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAmanda Pratzel vs Katherine Rist5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErin Swaller / Bekah Anderson vs Allyson Persky / Paige Madara2-6, 2-6
2023-06-21vs Gadsky homeWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Swaller / Bekah Anderson vs Abbie Bradley / Tracey K Trembath6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmanda Pratzel vs Katherine Rist7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-18vs Gadsky homeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gadsky / Sampada Coster vs Beatriz Juan Miranzo / Adela Finerty6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hoyos vs Allyson Persky6-2, 6-2
2023-06-11vs Gadsky homeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Whitehead / Jennifer Mckeown vs Beatriz Juan Miranzo / Michelle Fournier6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Pratzel vs Katherine Rist7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErin Swaller / Bekah Anderson vs Allyson Persky / Paige Madara6-7, 4-6
2023-06-04vs Gadsky homeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsey Whitehead / Jennifer Mckeown vs Beatriz Juan Miranzo / Michelle Fournier6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hoyos vs Allyson Persky7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBekah Anderson / Jennifer Gadsky vs Tracey K Trembath / Paige Madara6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W41123799
2Gadsky home1431224168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 5.04 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Amanda Pratzel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Bekah Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
Erin Swaller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
Jennifer Gadsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Mckeown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Whitehead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Hoyos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sampada Coster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bekah Anderson + Erin Swaller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Pratzel
66W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
5.04
5
Bekah Anderson
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Erin Swaller
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Gadsky
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Mckeown
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Whitehead
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Hoyos
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sampada Coster
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.