Teams

RFC:MidCourtCrisis:Winfeld

2021 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 55 & Over Women South

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2020-11-07vs RFC:Fab55:PeaseWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Boucher / Johanne Soucy-Camire vs Gwen Lambert / Patricia Martel-Buxton6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Rich / Marion Bannon vs Charlotte Pease / Sylvia Leblanc6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Lambert / Elizabeth Coates vs Julie Faure / Ann Harradon3-6, 4-6
2020-10-18vs RFC:Fab55:PeaseWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarion Bannon / Holly Rich vs Roma Bonnin / Joanne Chapman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohanne Soucy-Camire / Elizabeth Boucher vs Gwen Lambert / Charlotte Pease6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Lambert / Elizabeth Coates vs Ann Harradon / Andrea Otis-Higgins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 55 & Over Women South have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Marion Bannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Elizabeth Coates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Carol Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Catalina Mehler
published 3
Elizabeth Boucher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Holly Rich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Helen Attura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Johanne Soucy-Camire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Liz Winfeld
published
Patricia Franson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Boucher + Holly Rich7162% games+13.8% vs expected
Carol Lambert + Liz Winfeld4259% games+8.6% vs expected
Liz Winfeld + Marion Bannon9844% games−0.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Coates + Liz Winfeld3448% games−5.8% vs expected
Holly Rich + Marion Bannon7059% gamesnot enough data
Helen Attura + Holly Rich3250% gamesnot enough data
Johanne Soucy-Camire + Elizabeth Boucher314 matchesnot enough data
Johanne Soucy-Camire + Holly Rich134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marion Bannon
63W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Coates
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carol Lambert
113W–127L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Catalina Mehler
29W–37L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elizabeth Boucher
34W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Holly Rich
72W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Helen Attura
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Johanne Soucy-Camire
44W–75L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Liz Winfeld
54W–70L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Franson
42W–86L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.