Teams

MO-REG-Hunt/40&Over3.0W

40 & Over .0''s Aug. 25-27 · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Schwabauer000000
2IA-REG-VanVark/Cownie000000
3KS-REG-Power/40&Over3.0W000000
4NE-REG-Gilroy/Madhavan000000
5OK-REG-Dickason-McGinty000000
6STL-REG-Rhoads/40&Over3.0W000000
7MO-REG-Hunt/40&Over3.0W000000
8OKWC-REG-Johnson000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Vicki Brinck
published
2.97
Deb Jochems
published 3
2.89
Kenya Pearman
published
Ashlei Woelk
published 3
Linda Putman
published
Lori Hunt
published
Rebecca Petrino
published
Stephanie Turk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Petrino + Deb Jochems6158% games−7.5% vs expected
Lori Hunt + Ashlei Woelk4352% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Turk + Deb Jochems6165% gamesnot enough data
Deb Jochems + Vicki Brinck5167% gamesnot enough data
Ashlei Woelk + Stephanie Turk303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Brinck
43W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Deb Jochems
50W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kenya Pearman
27W–37L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Ashlei Woelk
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Cotner-Jones
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Putman
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Hunt
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Petrino
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Turk
34W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.