Teams

Suros-Freyre (Ron Ehmann)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-26vs Suchman (Alper JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEdna Suros-Freyre / Malu Atkinson vs Nancy Levy / Sharon Singh6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAna Freites / Christian Chamizo vs Jackie Blumenthal / Alba Pombo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-19vs Fernandez (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMalu Atkinson / Edna Suros-Freyre vs Veronica Hernandez / Vickie Krall2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-03-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMalu Atkinson / Edna Suros-Freyre vs Cheryl Levin / Monica MacArio6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-03-05vs Miami-Dade - TeamFormanLost 01
L#1 DoublesMalu Atkinson / Carolina Milano vs Maira Maguire / ANGELA MUSSO3-6, 3-6
2021-02-26vs Banciella (Continental)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLuanne Boiko / Malu Atkinson vs Blanca Cabrera / Lydia Puente6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-02-19vs Porter (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristian Chamizo / Aglyn Perez vs Amy Shapiro / Nancy Michelson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-02-12vs Plaza (Flamingo Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMalu Atkinson / Edna Suros-Freyre vs Hetty van de Kreeke / Marcia Montoya6-1, 6-2
2021-01-22vs Crowley (Shula's)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAglyn Perez / Christian Chamizo vs Adela Tichacek / Elba Martinez6-3, 6-4
2021-01-15vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCristina Blanco / Malu Atkinson vs Belkys Ortiz / Mildred Houdayer6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristian Chamizo / Luanne Boiko vs MONICA DONATO / Yersika Fernandez Labrador4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Carolina Milano
published 3
2.75
Malu Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.75
Rosemary McComas
published
2.73
Christian Chamizo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Beth Lang
published 3
2.66
Ana Romero Nunez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary McComas + Christian Chamizo41445% games−11.3% vs expected
Rosemary McComas + Malu Atkinson6253% gamesnot enough data
Christian Chamizo + Malu Atkinson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolina Milano
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
Malu Atkinson
83W–68L career · 7 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.75
Rosemary McComas
44W–51L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christian Chamizo
77W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Beth Lang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Ana Romero Nunez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.