Teams

Urban 65s 3.5W Thurs AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 65 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs Haggard 65s 3.5W Thurs AMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Boger / Laura Herring vs Julia Barnes / Michelle Harris3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Wetzel / Carol Kimmons vs Wanda Davis / Spoma Jovanovic6-1, 6-3
2025-04-12vs Cober 65s 3.5W Thurs AMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Herring / Brenda MacFadden vs Debbie Burgess / Vickie Degges6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Hendrix / Carol Kimmons vs Bette Boone / Ethel Neal3-6, 5-7
2025-04-10vs Atchison 65s 3.5W Thurs AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesCookie Guarini / Susan Wetzel vs Judy Eaton / Nancy McNeill2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Debbie Lane vs Susan Payne / Mary Jane Tarver2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Boger / Laura Herring vs Patty Dutton / Elizabeth Deterding6-1, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Titzer 65s 3.5W Thurs AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Wetzel / Cookie Guarini vs Martha Fogleman / Lisa Liringis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Carol Kimmons vs Shelby Rhyne / Kathy Jones2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Urban / Sherri Nichols Hill vs Cindy Lynk / Sue Ann Lapp1-6, 4-6
2025-04-03vs Cober 65s 3.5W Thurs AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Pardue / Aprille Black vs Karen Brady-Siler / Robin Smith6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSherri Nichols Hill / Janet Umphenour vs Debbie Burgess / Vickie Degges6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Kimmons / Sandra Furr vs Denise Fiery / Scottie Penn5-7, 3-6
2025-03-27vs Titzer 65s 3.5W Thurs AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Urban / Debbie Lane vs Martha Fogleman / Lisa Liringis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Hendrix / Laura Herring vs Kathy Jones / Teresa Dail2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAprille Black / Susan Pardue vs Pamela Aikens / Jean Pudlo6-3, 6-3
2025-03-20vs Haggard 65s 3.5W Thurs AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Urban / Susan Wetzel vs Michelle Harris / Julia Barnes7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Umphenour / Debbie Lane vs Betty Haggard / Wanda Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Laura Herring vs Spoma Jovanovic / Deborah Young6-2, 6-1
2025-03-06vs Atchison 65s 3.5W Thurs AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Urban / Anne Hendrix vs Nancy McNeill / Janis Beshears4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAprille Black / Susan Pardue vs Patty Dutton / Lynn Tester4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Boger / Laura Herring vs Cindy McElreath / Debbie Shiflet3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Kimmons
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Debbie Lane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diane Boger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diane Urban
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Aprille Black
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Cookie Guarini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Brenda MacFadden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anne Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Sandra Furr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Umphenour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Herring
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sherri Nichols Hill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Pardue
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Wetzel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aprille Black + Susan Pardue303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Herring + Diane Boger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Kimmons
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Lane
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diane Boger
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diane Urban
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cookie Guarini
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Brenda MacFadden
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Anne Hendrix
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Furr
0W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Janet Umphenour
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Herring
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherri Nichols Hill
0W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Pardue
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Wetzel
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.