Teams

LCTA18/Rowland/Creekside

2022 LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-11-09vs LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Keith / Elizabeth Hiers vs Nicole Hause / Elizabeth Simons3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMary Anacleto vs Katie Linton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Dangerfield / Coleen Martin vs Jasmine King / Masheed Rockwell2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHeather Hewson vs Kristen Chitty6-3, 6-1
2023-11-02vs LCTA18/Britton/MaybankLost 04
L#1 DoublesRenee Straub / Beth Hasty vs Lizzie Goddard / Allison Ryan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Anacleto vs Katy Hanna3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCooper Collier / Ann Anderson vs Bethany Britton / Kristin Korotney4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHeather Hewson vs Caitlin Aburrow7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Renee Straub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Cooper Collier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jennifer Keith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Meghan Rowland
published
3.20
Elizabeth Hiers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mary Anacleto
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Ashley Warnock
published 3
2.85
Leigh Dangerfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Coleen Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Heather Hewson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cooper Collier + Jennifer Keith5260% games+6.3% vs expected
Renee Straub + Elizabeth Hiers241156% games+2.9% vs expected
Coleen Martin + Heather Hewson0534% gamesnot enough data
Mary Anacleto + Leigh Dangerfield213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Straub
40W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cooper Collier
45W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Jennifer Keith
101W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Meghan Rowland
17W–32L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Hiers
35W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Anacleto
18W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Ashley Warnock
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Leigh Dangerfield
49W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Coleen Martin
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Heather Hewson
3W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.