Teams

WP GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs HRCA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Matthews / Evan Wehmeyer vs Christopher Johnson / Nathanael Arnold7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatthew Kaeo vs Oliver Thurman4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJace Monroe / Clint Jones vs Patrick Brisch / Justin Bengtson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndy Kim / Jeffrey D'Andrea vs Zachary Branigan / Jack Hwang2-6, 4-6
2022-05-26vs LEBTC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Matthews / Evan Wehmeyer vs Tony Gerome / Bill Childs4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJace Monroe vs Ben Williamson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Kim / Jeffrey D'Andrea vs Robert Schock / Andy Newton6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Andrew Tiktin / Michael Jackson7-6, 6-2
2022-05-19vs LTFC BLUEWon 41
W#1 DoublesJace Monroe / Michael Matthews vs Marcello Azevedo / Joe Pascucci6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMatthew Kaeo vs Natan Ashkenazi1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Todd Berich / Warren Adams7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBrian Brillantes vs Matthew Gleason6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndy Kim / Jeffrey D'Andrea vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-16vs SSH BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJace Monroe / Evan Wehmeyer vs Ryan Beckstrom / Ryan Schellpeper6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Michael Matthews vs Paul Jaszewski / Erik Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeffrey D'Andrea / Matthew Kaeo vs Adam Smith / Craig Stromberg6-3, 6-4
2022-05-12vs ATC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Brillantes / Andy Kim vs Zachary Bishop / William Morris4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Kaeo / Jace Monroe vs Brett Fischer / Huntington Walker6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Matthew Domich / Bernard Darre6-4, 6-2
2022-05-06vs LEBTC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesJeffrey D'Andrea / Matthew Kaeo vs Matthew Bruff / Benjamin Walker4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Andrew Banks / Chip Hudson6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJace Monroe vs Jordan Jacob4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Matthews / Evan Wehmeyer vs Jim Carpenter / Sam Gompers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs CACM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Michael Matthews vs Brett Allenbach / Marc Costain6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBrian Brillantes vs Scott Justus3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Wehmeyer / Jace Monroe vs Adam Huff / Bob Lees6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndy Kim / Jeffrey D'Andrea vs Brian Pinkerton / Todd Harrington6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Matthew Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Brian Brillantes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Jeffrey D'Andrea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.22
Evan Wehmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.20
Jace Monroe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.11
Clint Jones
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Michael Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Andy Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Matthew Kaeo
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey D'Andrea + Evan Wehmeyer3359% games+12.6% vs expected
Matthew Hooper + Clint Jones17756% games+5.3% vs expected
Michael Matthews + Jace Monroe4650% games+4.2% vs expected
Clint Jones + Michael Matthews4258% games+0.2% vs expected
Evan Wehmeyer + Michael Matthews5153% games−1.1% vs expected
Evan Wehmeyer + Jace Monroe4353% games−10.6% vs expected
Matthew Hooper + Michael Matthews4164% gamesnot enough data
Clint Jones + Jeffrey D'Andrea224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hooper
88W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Brian Brillantes
15W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jeffrey D'Andrea
58W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Evan Wehmeyer
35W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Jace Monroe
28W–25L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Clint Jones
41W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
Michael Matthews
36W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Andy Kim
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Matthew Kaeo
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.