Teams

Venkatesu

2024 · 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-26vs NOGTA/Shazman AliLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhil Johnson / Rodney Silvers vs Shazman Ali / Bryce Curry6-7, 6-7
2024-11-12vs NOGTA/Shazman AliLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Robbins / Scott Higgins vs Shazman Ali / Derek McCoy2-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs NOGTA/Shazman AliLost 01
L#1 DoublesRodney Silvers / Scott Higgins vs Kanishkan Bharathy / Derek McCoy1-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs NOGTA/Shazman AliLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Robbins / Phil Johnson vs Bryce Curry / Edis Krnjic1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Luke Mckenzie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.54
Joseph Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Rommel Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Raymond Chang
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.29
Ashwin Venkatesu
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
3.20
Phil Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Rodney Silvers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Raymond Chang + Rommel Ramos044 matchesnot enough data
Rommel Ramos + Scott Higgins044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
9W–23L career · type M · 6 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Luke Mckenzie
27W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Joseph Robbins
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rommel Ramos
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Raymond Chang
38W–43L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Ashwin Venkatesu
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Scott Higgins
44W–37L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Rodney Silvers
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.