Teams

SYR: Yablonski 55 7.0

2023 55&Over Women · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-18vs RadoffLost 12
L#1 DoublesShirley Yablonski / Robyn Wishna vs Sharon Gerber / Helen MacDonald7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Nelligan / Veronica Hotaling vs Elizabeth Hill / Joanne Engelhardt6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Jordan / Doreen Kingsley vs Elisabeth Moughty / Kim Waale6-7, 1-6
2023-07-11vs RadoffWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandrine Crane / Robyn Wishna vs Sharon Gerber / Joanne Engelhardt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohanna Kmetz / Doreen Kingsley vs Kim Waale / Susan Greetham6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShirley Yablonski / Susan Berger vs Karen Nardella / Juliet Concilla3-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs RadoffLost 12
W#1 DoublesRobyn Wishna / Alexandrine Crane vs Laura Kahn / Marla Share6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTina Nabinger / Melody Fredrickson vs Sharon Gerber / Mindy Turner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Nelligan / Susan Berger vs Elizabeth Hill / Joanne Engelhardt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-20vs RadoffLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Jordan / Melody Fredrickson vs Helen MacDonald / Mindy Turner4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohanna Kmetz / Jacki Goldberg vs Gwenn Judge / Laura Kahn3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Nelligan / Veronica Hotaling vs Elisabeth Moughty / Ruth Sikora2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-13vs RadoffWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley Yablonski / Tina Nabinger vs Laura Kahn / Nancy Radoff4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacki Goldberg / Kathleen Jordan vs Helen MacDonald / Gwenn Judge2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Nelligan / Susan Berger vs Mindy Turner / Susan Greetham6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs RadoffWon 30
W#1 DoublesShirley Yablonski / Alexandrine Crane vs Elizabeth Hill / Mindy Turner6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelody Fredrickson / Tina Nabinger vs Gwenn Judge / Ruth Sikora6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohanna Kmetz / Doreen Kingsley vs Nancy Radoff / Laura Kahn7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: Yablonski 55 7.03310820163
2Radoff3381024178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Alexandrine Crane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Doreen Kingsley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lisa Nelligan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Melody Fredrickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Susan Berger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Veronica Hotaling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Jacki Goldberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Shirley Yablonski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Johanna Kmetz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Kathleen Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Robyn Wishna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Nabinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doreen Kingsley + Veronica Hotaling7158% games+9.3% vs expected
Johanna Kmetz + Shirley Yablonski10459% games−0.9% vs expected
Lisa Nelligan + Veronica Hotaling5348% games−2.8% vs expected
Kathleen Jordan + Melody Fredrickson1536% games−5.1% vs expected
Kathleen Jordan + Shirley Yablonski3344% gamesnot enough data
Tina Nabinger + Shirley Yablonski3251% gamesnot enough data
Melody Fredrickson + Shirley Yablonski2350% gamesnot enough data
Johanna Kmetz + Kathleen Jordan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandrine Crane
89W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Doreen Kingsley
70W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Nelligan
94W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Melody Fredrickson
32W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Susan Berger
95W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Veronica Hotaling
109W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jacki Goldberg
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Shirley Yablonski
63W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Johanna Kmetz
39W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Kathleen Jordan
81W–128L career · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.92
Robyn Wishna
24W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Nabinger
24W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.