← Teams

WHRC-Leong(4.0)

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Susan Suttich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Anita Rockwell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Melissa Smith
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Marie Dorsey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Robin Kaukonen
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Maryam Farinola
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen McNairy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-06-17Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesMarie Dorsey vs Jin Velasco6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Courtney Storrs / Sara van Beckum5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell vs Kaie Wellman / Holly Miele6-1, 6-3
2023-06-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Marie Dorsey vs Sarah Petersen / Theresa Mallari6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Smith vs Carrie Willis6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren McNairy / Heike Droste vs Carol Chiu / Mary Chennault7-6, 6-2
2023-06-11Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Julie Brown vs Beth Steffes / Julie Bradford6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaryam Farinola vs Michelle Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIrena Ilcheva / Robin Kaukonen vs Katherine Lomartire / Suzanne Boss2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Marie Dorsey vs Kara Gajowskyj / Tonya Halog7-5, 6-3
2023-05-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell vs Cathryn Hansen / Liz DelPlato6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMelissa Smith vs Crystal Bryant2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaryam Farinola / Heike Droste vs Kari Martin / Erin Hill6-4, 6-3
2023-05-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Susan Suttich vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Shannon Roarke6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRobin Kaukonen / Maryam Farinola vs Estera Clark / Ren Toshié Miura6-3, 6-2
2023-05-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRobin Kaukonen / Karen McNairy vs Rebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Rockwell / Monica Rivares vs Char Riley / Jan Rothert6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeike Droste / Michele Heinrichson vs Mary Elliott / Andrea Robertson6-1, 6-2
2023-04-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSusan Suttich / Karen McNairy vs Nikki Metcalf / Michaela Bancud2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Smith vs Megan Meagher6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeike Droste / Michele Heinrichson vs Kim Spathas / Alyssa Wong5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Heike Droste vs Jeanette Thomas / Whitney Palfreyman6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRobin Kaukonen vs Megan Meagher6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnita Rockwell / Monica Rivares vs Jean Herbst / Dana McKillop6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Susan Suttich
59W–35L career
9%91%0%
3.65
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%80%20%
3.50
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Melissa Smith
47W–54L career
0%93%7%
3.43
3.5
Marie Dorsey
24W–32L career
1%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Robin Kaukonen
23W–53L career
1%97%2%
3.28
3.5
Maryam Farinola
55W–59L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.