Teams

FK - Walsh

2024 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-23vs Villages - Hoops/SchappellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJan Cole / Susan Garrick vs Nancy Rushman / Patty Swanson0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-02vs Marion/Centonze/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Garrick / Lisa Degirolami vs Nancy Little / Pamela Plumlee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-24vs SKY - PayneLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Tina Shuman vs Sarah Collinson / Peggy Ridgway1-6, 2-6
2024-02-10vs Marion/Centonze/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Garrick / Marti Little vs Carmen Rosario / Leigh Chak7-5, 6-0
2024-01-28vs Villages - Hoops/SchappellWon 20
W#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Susan Garrick vs Rene Stinnett / Yvonne Schappell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Croy / Marti Little vs Erica Migliorati / Patti Hischmann7-5, 7-6
2024-01-27vs Villages - Hoops/SchappellLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Stablein / Susan Garrick vs Rene Stinnett / Yvonne Schappell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-20vs Marion/Centonze/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesJan Cole / Susan Garrick vs Eileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza2-6, 5-7
2024-01-13vs SKY - PayneLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Croy / Tina Shuman vs Debra Malone / Lynne Finman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Diane Stablein
published 4
3.52
Lori Croy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Valerie Elvin
published
3.46
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.34
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
Jan Cole
published
Jill Kimball
published
Lisa Degirolami
published
Susan Garrick
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Lori Croy5252% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Kimball
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Degirolami
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.