Teams

Fabbro - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-15vs Mosley - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Stephen McCrory vs Michael Yager / Bennett Gaston5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-15vs Farkas - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamuel Wallace / Robert Fabbro vs Colton Wilson / Kyle Wilson3-6, 1-6
2024-10-01vs Mosley - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Chase Dupuis vs Timothy Sumrall / JOHNNY DICKSON7-5, 6-2
2024-09-03vs Farkas - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Will Spencer vs Colton Wilson / Carl Miller3-6, 3-6
2024-08-27vs Escambia/Worley/TriLevel4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Will Spencer vs Mario Stramaglia / Rudy Seelmann7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
4.00
Will Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Samuel Wallace
published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.40
James Craft
published 3.5
3.37
Chase Dupuis
published 3.5
Jack Ettelson
published 3.5
2.98
Addison van Pelt
published 3
2.86
Zach Pohlmann
published
Matthew Meekins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Spencer + Robert Fabbro231656% games−2.7% vs expected
Jack Ettelson + James Craft303 matchesnot enough data
Addison van Pelt + Matthew Meekins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Frederic Letourneau
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.01
Will Spencer
121W–56L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
Samuel Wallace
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 13 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
James Craft
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chase Dupuis
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Jack Ettelson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Addison van Pelt
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Zach Pohlmann
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Matthew Meekins
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.