Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-18vs KY/LOU/BEAM-KIKLost 12
W#1 DoublesTamara Duvall-McClain / Ellen Clements vs Elizabeth Torp / Whitney Jamie6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesClare Burkhart vs Kristie Goodwin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Weathers / Mechelle Kaufman vs Shannon Kessler / Elizabeth Goodknight2-6, 3-6
2025-01-26vs KY/LOU/MAGARWon 41
W#1 DoublesLouise Todd / Kim Johnson vs Katie Windhorst / Christine Sillings6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKate Hendon vs Caroline Mulcahy3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Smiley / Kim Orick vs Lyndsay Magar / Andrea Schnurr6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTamara Duvall-McClain / Linda Ross vs Nicole Boehm / Stephanie Saxton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Karen Weathers vs Erin Frazier / Tammy Hale6-0, 6-2
2025-01-12vs KY/LOU/RILEY/BARROTTLost 23
L#1 DoublesThuy Murphy / Mechelle Kaufman vs Carrie Ehrhard / Brittany Brice7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClare Burkhart vs Lindsey Graves0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTamara Duvall-McClain / Kim Johnson vs Renee Thiesing / Elizabeth Austin1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaryl Alfrey / Ellen Clements vs Meghan Myron / Debbie Widman6-2, 6-0
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Winkler / Kate Hendon vs Melissa Lowe / Jill Watson2-6, 5-7
2025-01-04vs KY/LOU/WEIDMAN/BROOKSWon 32
W#1 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Thuy Murphy vs Heather Richardson / Becca Haynes6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTamara Duvall-McClain vs Deanna Gordinier6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Smiley / Kim Orick vs Beth Barnickle / Kathryn Carter1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Stephanie Kaebnick vs Wendy Ohlson / Karen Quinkert2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#4 DoublesBettye Wright / Linda Ross vs Melissa Weidman / Gretchen Molinari6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Thuy Murphy
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Karen Weathers
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Tamara Duvall-McClain
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.86
Christine Montgomery
usually #4 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.84
Stephanie Kaebnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Mary Smiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Kim Orick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Ellen Clements
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Bettye Wright
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Lindagarde Dalton
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Clare Burkhart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Winkler
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Hendon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Louise Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thuy Murphy + Christine Montgomery3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Mary Smiley + Kim Orick1544% games−3.3% vs expected
Thuy Murphy + Mechelle Kaufman4457% games−6.9% vs expected
Christine Montgomery + Karen Weathers3452% games−7.8% vs expected
Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers2354% gamesnot enough data
Mary Smiley + Ellen Clements224 matchesnot enough data
Daryl Alfrey + Christine Montgomery044 matchesnot enough data
Kim Orick + Ellen Clements033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thuy Murphy
20W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Karen Weathers
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Tamara Duvall-McClain
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Christine Montgomery
30W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Stephanie Kaebnick
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mary Smiley
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kim Orick
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Ellen Clements
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Bettye Wright
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Lindagarde Dalton
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Clare Burkhart
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Elizabeth Winkler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kate Hendon
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Todd
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.