Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Ivory Ridge-Holland/JarvieSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesJill Ford / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Tammy Petersen / Nanette Brockbank6-1, 6-4
L#3 Female DoublesShelli Johnston / Taylor Kirk vs Mindy Christofferson / Robyn Davis4-6, 3-2, 0-1
2023-12-07vs RISE AC-GlinesLost 12
W#1 Female DoublesKathleen Covey / Belinda Jensen vs Stacey Cahoon / Jennifer Jensen6-7, 2-1, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesValerie Blackhurst / Kimberly Mayfield vs Sarah Love / Kristi Warren3-6, 5-2, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesShannon Mangum / Tena Maughan vs Nancy Skidmore / Amy Johnson4-6, 1-6
2023-11-30vs Sunpro-Leishman/MortensenWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesBelinda Jensen / Tyra Cook vs Suzanne Burdge / Melanie Hall6-2, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesBrenda Fowler / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Katrina Harlan / DeeAnn Edwards6-2, 2-5, 1-0
2023-11-16vs Sports Mall-AffleckWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesBelinda Jensen / Brenda Fowler vs Crystel Fox / Cristie Briggs6-4, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesShelli Johnston / Jill Ford vs Lindie Hoggan / Natalie Watts4-6, 4-3, 1-0
2023-11-09vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#1 Female SinglesSherilyn Rawlings vs Faith Petersen6-7, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesValerie Blackhurst / Kimberly Mayfield vs Renae Brooks / Sherree Greenhalgh6-3, 6-2
2023-11-02vs Ivory Ridge-Holland/JarvieWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesTyra Cook / Shelli Johnston vs Lori Murdock / Lori Taylor6-2, 5-2
W#2 Female DoublesTiffany Olson / Tena Maughan vs Christine Neeleman / Tammy Petersen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Taylor Kirk
published
3.77
Lisa Mayberry
published
3.72
Kim Santiago
published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
published
3.69
Kimberly Mayfield
published
3.67
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #1 Female Singles 33%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jill Ford
published
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Kimberlie Bayne
published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
published 4
3.52
Shelli Johnston
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
published
3.38
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.17
Shannon Mangum
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Covey
published
Susan Groesbeck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford5156% games+11.9% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler9357% games+10.1% vs expected
Kimberly Mayfield + Shelli Johnston4161% games+7.9% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.2% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Tiffany Olson3357% games+5.4% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Kim Santiago7164% games+5.0% vs expected
Kimberly Mayfield + Kim Santiago18754% games+4.6% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry5557% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Belinda Jensen
147W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Taylor Kirk
80W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Lisa Mayberry
81W–78L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kim Santiago
154W–86L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Tiffany Olson
116W–52L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Kimberly Mayfield
65W–38L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
134W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Jill Ford
85W–63L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Kimberlie Bayne
96W–123L career · type A · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Brenda Fowler
88W–77L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Halli Craft
63W–46L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Shannon Mangum
28W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kathleen Covey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Groesbeck
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.