Teams

GJTC KKILLIAN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-18vs GJTC JWENDTLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Terrell / Seth Ritchey vs John Wendt / Bradley Seago4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-06vs GJTC SHARPLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Ken Wilson vs Stuart Hall / Christopher Cutsforth6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-02vs GJTC JWENDTLost 02
L#1 DoublesBruce DeRush / Seth Ritchey vs Mathew Dokoupil / Aaron Clay0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Andy Ford vs Jeff Thornton / John Wendt7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-13vs GJTC SHARPLost 02
L#2 DoublesBiff Messinger / Keith Killian vs John Hanna / David Pacini1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSeth Ritchey / Gary Reed vs Jim Paregien / John Groves6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-06vs GJTC JWENDTLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Dan Oliver vs Aaron Clay / Joseph Pologar7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSeth Ritchey vs Steve Brown1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Seth Ritchey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Paul Poudrier
published
2.78
Keith Killian
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dan Oliver
published 3
2.71
Dan Terrell
published 3
Andy Ford
published
Biff Messinger
published
Bruce DeRush
published
Jonathan St.Peter
published
Kevin McGuinness
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Ritchey + Keith Killian1735% games−9.6% vs expected
Dan Oliver + Seth Ritchey2347% gamesnot enough data
Dan Terrell + Seth Ritchey134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin McGuinness + Keith Killian134 matchesnot enough data
Dan Oliver + Biff Messinger123 matchesnot enough data
Dan Oliver + Dan Terrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Seth Ritchey
40W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Paul Poudrier
7W–14L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Keith Killian
40W–109L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Dan Oliver
25W–62L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Dan Terrell
18W–47L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
Andy Ford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Biff Messinger
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Bruce DeRush
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jonathan St.Peter
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin McGuinness
17W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.