Teams

The Crew/Popovic/Sunnyvale

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJuan Castillo / Dan Nandra vs Michael Bedard / Kevin Lowe4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVladan Popovic / Alexander Spicer vs Cesar Hernandez / Tuan Khong6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAleksandr A Bgatov / Daniel Balabanovich vs Daniel Ocasio / Demetrius Andrews6-3, 6-3
2024-10-25vs Ruud Awakening/Pias/SunnyvaleWon 21
L#1 DoublesJuan Castillo / Tajoe Lun vs Theo Novak / Donny Su2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlexander Spicer / Vladan Popovic vs David Le / Daniel Lloyd Pias6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAleksandr A Bgatov / Daniel Balabanovich vs Sean Felder / Sejin Kwag6-1, 6-4
2024-10-25vs ASRC/Mun/AlmadenWon 21
L#1 DoublesTajoe Lun / Juan Castillo vs Sam Behbehani / Scott Monismith1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKeyan Fallahi / Alex Bychkoviak vs Shane Park / Gregory Mclean2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Balabanovich / Aleksandr A Bgatov vs William Africa / Wade Conklin6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Alexander Spicer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Dan Nandra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Matt Romano
published
3.89
Aleksandr A Bgatov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Alex Bychkoviak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Tajoe Lun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Vladan Popovic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Daniel Balabanovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Keyan Fallahi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aleksandr A Bgatov + Daniel Balabanovich5063% games+1.1% vs expected
Alex Bychkoviak + Aleksandr A Bgatov6253% games−10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexander Spicer
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Dan Nandra
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
8%90%1%
4.19
Matt Romano
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Aleksandr A Bgatov
27W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Alex Bychkoviak
27W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
Tajoe Lun
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.81
Vladan Popovic
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Daniel Balabanovich
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Keyan Fallahi
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.