← Teams

CAC-Morales

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.89 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
John Christiaan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Tim Luangrath
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Dave Vinik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
Scott Eliason
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Robert Ferek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Tony Khamsouk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Min Lee
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.31
Jim Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Len Morales
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-11-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLen Morales / Tony Khamsouk vs Anthony Valenzuela / Carlin Jackson6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Tim Luangrath vs Lance Berkey / Steve Carns6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Christiaan / Frank Olson vs Ken Crowley / Scott Mayer6-3, 6-1
2022-10-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Dave Vinik vs John Popplewell / Bill Henderson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Christiaan / Min Lee vs Jonathan Barg / Donald Brenneman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFrank Olson / Tony Khamsouk vs Jeffrey Krum / David Hill7-6, 6-4
2022-10-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJim Wheeler / Dave Vinik vs Francisco Rivera-Giusti / Peter Schulte6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Luangrath / Scott Eliason vs Steve Sun / Jim Hamlik6-4, 6-4
2022-10-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Jim Wheeler vs Peter Monsantofils / Floyd Grant6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLen Morales / John Christiaan vs Gary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTony Khamsouk / Scott Anderson vs Perry Sides / Tim Brink6-1, 6-3
2022-10-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTim Luangrath / Tony Khamsouk vs Clark Cosart / Jae Joon Kang6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDave Vinik / Jim Wheeler vs Patrick Trank / Matthew Trank7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFrank Olson / John Christiaan vs Chris Eddy / William Anderson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDave Vinik / Robert Ferek vs Patrick Herbst / Brian Posewitz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Luangrath / Scott Eliason vs Todd Eckelman / John Hall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Wheeler / Scott Anderson vs William Hergenhan / Kevin Pedigo5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDave Vinik / John Christiaan vs Tony Moreno / Patrick Maginnis1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Dan McKay vs Patrick Harkin / Neil Soiffer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Eliason / Min Lee vs Warren Hill / Rick Collins6-2, 6-2
2022-09-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesScott Eliason / Tim Luangrath vs Terence Gariety / Jack Hughes6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Christiaan / Min Lee vs William Malloch / Steven Wilker4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDave Vinik / Len Morales vs Steve Harris / Keith Gordon6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
John Christiaan
52W–49L career
not enough data
—
4
Tim Luangrath
13W–35L career
7%92%0%
3.66
4
Dave Vinik
79W–84L career
6%94%0%
3.66
4
Scott Eliason
67W–73L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Robert Ferek
75W–92L career
27%73%0%
3.53
4
Tony Khamsouk
49W–115L career
37%63%0%
3.49
4
Min Lee
46W–41L career
56%44%0%
3.42
3.5
Jim Wheeler
60W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.31
3.5
Len Morales
43W–69L career
8%92%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.