Teams

Do, Dawson

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-08vs Kimble, PaulSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHector Custode / Landon Black vs Mitch Evans / Jay Irving0-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Sims / Kellon Lawrence vs Paul Kimble / Rahul Chaddha6-4, 5-4
2026-06-17vs Kimble, PaulWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawson Do / Zackery Presnall vs Brad Boteler / Ryan Brister6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEvans Henderson / Patrick Royals vs Russell Dendy / Jay Irving6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Kimble, PaulWon 20
W#1 DoublesHector Custode / Joseph M Jabour vs Ryan Brister / Travis Ezelle6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdam Byrd / Matt Thomas vs JD Hosemann / Sourav Dutta6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Dawson Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Brooks Buffington
published 4.5
3.55
Landon Black
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Zackery Presnall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Adam Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Kellon Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Joseph M Jabour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Jonathan Sims
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Evans Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Royals
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Byrd + Jonathan Sims8265% games+9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dawson Do
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Brooks Buffington
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
Landon Black
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.55
Zackery Presnall
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Adam Byrd
47W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kellon Lawrence
16W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Joseph M Jabour
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jonathan Sims
38W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Evans Henderson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Royals
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.