Teams

Treviso Bay - D. Paller

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-08vs Vineyards - KronenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Ellis / Joan Barrett vs Jennifer Johnson / Rhonda Kelly6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-12-01vs MarcoYMCA - L.KeelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Joan Barrett vs Victoria Pollock / Peggy Keigley6-1, 6-2
2022-11-17vs Players Club - ShelineLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Janet Ellis vs Crystie Ciriello / Susan Dow4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Janet Ellis vs Shawn Fiore / Laura Fischer6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesConstance Cape / Joan Barrett vs Barbara Country / Dawn Cooper6-1, 7-6
2022-11-09vs Marco YMCA - AmatoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Janet Ellis vs Dawn Amato / Luanne Kerins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesConstance Cape / Joan Barrett vs Dana Sacks / Margaret Garofalo4-6, 5-7
2022-11-03vs Naples Beach Hotel - EddyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Ellis / Caroline Rogers vs Barbara Frank / Martha Peterson6-4, 6-0
2022-10-27vs Cambier - DoubleTrouble -TrombleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Connie Mosbaugh vs Maureen Sexson / Linda Stovall6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-20vs Sterling Oaks - C. GouldLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Connie Mosbaugh vs Amy McHale / Barbara Beard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.30
Joan Barrett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Deborah Paller
published 3.5
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Darlene Carpenter
published 3.5
Constance Cape
published
Ellen Hermannsson
published
Janet Ellis
published
Terina Korda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Rogers + Janet Ellis4353% gamesnot enough data
Joan Barrett + Caroline Rogers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Joan Barrett
159W–116L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Deborah Paller
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Darlene Carpenter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Constance Cape
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ellen Hermannsson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Ellis
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terina Korda
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.