Teams

Leflay / Renner

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-18vs Reinhart: Sarah's Volley Girls_W25Split 11
W#1 DoublesMiriam Deskin / Nicole Fallon vs Jennifer Voegele / Sarah Reinhart7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Bothe / Shannon Fletcher vs Jennifer Kennedy / Uyen Pham2-6, 1-6
2025-02-25vs Reinhart: Sarah's Volley Girls_W25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Bothe / Laura Schurhamer vs Jennifer Voegele / Uyen Pham2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMiriam Deskin vs Muqing Li3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Renner / Kay Leflay vs Jennifer Kennedy / Amy Graves4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Reinhart: Sarah's Volley Girls_W25Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRanita Quale / Shannon Fletcher vs Jennifer Voegele / Uyen Pham4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Fallon vs Muqing Li3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Schurhamer / Kay Leflay vs Jenna Graves / Amy Graves3-6, 3-6
2025-01-14vs Reinhart: Sarah's Volley Girls_W25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Schurhamer / Nicole Fallon vs Amy Graves / Jenna Graves4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRanita Quale vs Jennifer Voegele6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Renner / Shannon Fletcher vs Jennifer Kennedy / Uyen Pham1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.27
Miriam Deskin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Nicole Fallon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.16
Kristin Renner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Laura Schurhamer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Ranita Quale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.81
Mary Ann Bothe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kay Leflay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Fallon + Miriam Deskin2340% games−0.4% vs expected
Nicole Fallon + Laura Schurhamer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam Deskin
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Nicole Fallon
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Kristin Renner
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Laura Schurhamer
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Ranita Quale
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Mary Ann Bothe
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Kay Leflay
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.