Teams

GR-Smith (40s 8.5W C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 40 & Over · 40s 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-05vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Hine / Sherry Smith vs Doris Smith / Sherry Hambright6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Tingle / Katherine McClintic vs Cameron Fitzsimmons / Denise Wells6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Davis / Gaye Brinn vs Marsha Pierson / Joni Izumi-Nakamoto6-4, 6-0
2025-09-28vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMissy Barrow / Carol Taylor vs Stephanie Garner / Merry Katherine Glover5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSherry Smith / Ina Jones vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Marsha Pierson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Davis / Marie Tingle vs Denise Wells / Cheryl Watson6-0, 6-3
2025-09-14vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesIna Jones / Sherry Smith vs Doris Smith / Sherry Hambright1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarie Tingle / Gaye Brinn vs Cameron Fitzsimmons / Cheryl Watson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Wolfe / Katherine McClintic vs Marsha Pierson / Joni Izumi-Nakamoto7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-07vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Ina Jones vs Sherry Hambright / Doris Smith2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzan Martin / Carol Taylor vs Stephanie Garner / Merry Katherine Glover4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Tingle / Mignon Ingram vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Denise Wells6-4, 6-1
2025-08-17vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Ann Hine vs Stephanie Garner / Merry Katherine Glover4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine McClintic / Amy Wolfe vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Cameron Fitzsimmons7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarie Tingle / Mignon Ingram vs Cheryl Watson / Ann Henderson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-03vs OP-Watson NETTERS (40s 8.5W C)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Ina Jones vs Sherry Hambright / Doris Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMissy Barrow / Jill Davis vs Stephanie Garner / Denise Wells6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarie Tingle / Katherine McClintic vs Cheryl Watson / Ann Henderson3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40s 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Hine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.73
Ina Jones
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Mignon Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Missy Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.47
Carol Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.31
Amy Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Suzan Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Marie Tingle
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Gaye Brinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katherine McClintic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mignon Ingram + Marie Tingle6649% games+7.2% vs expected
Missy Barrow + Suzan Martin2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Hine
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ina Jones
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mignon Ingram
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Missy Barrow
27W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
4
Carol Taylor
11W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Amy Wolfe
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Suzan Martin
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Marie Tingle
12W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Gaye Brinn
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Katherine McClintic
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.