Teams

Wager - Congressional 3.0

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-28vs Pinto - The PlayersWon 30
W#1 DoublesSkye Replogle / Kathryn Powell vs Sheila Maloney / Tracy Koretsky6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Kimpel / Alison Wager vs Mara Nelson-Grynaviski / Ursula Iannone6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEmily Warke / Anne-Marie Coakley vs Nancy Pinto / Wendy Wasserman3-2
2025-08-25vs Brady - Manor 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Wager / Chandler Carr vs Laura Davis / Kathryn Lloyd6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSamantha Brown / Julia La Vay vs Abbie Brady / KAREN WALKER6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAmrita Rai / Melissa Sullivan Greissing vs Mary Lou Goehrung / Heather Tinsley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs EspositoWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Kathryn Powell vs Nicole Islinger / Ingrid Martin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlison Wager / Suzanne Kimpel vs Tonya Esposito / Kelly Bradshaw6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNatalie Green / Emily Warke vs Niki Hamilton / Jennifer Donaghue6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-13vs CorneliusWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarina Bartozzi / Kathryn Powell vs Helen Chao / Paula Pels7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChandler Carr / Emily Warke vs Jocelyn Lin / Lemin Xiao5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt vs Bonnie Skafte / Elizabeth Overmann6-2, 6-1
2025-08-04vs Pinto - The PlayersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Doyle / Carina Bartozzi vs Kamlesh Dhallan / Sheila Maloney6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJaci Peterson / Anne-Marie Coakley vs Ursula Iannone / Mara Nelson-Grynaviski1-6, 4-6
2025-07-23vs Brady - Manor 3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Kimpel / Skye Replogle vs Abbie Brady / Veronica Vannoy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Wager / Jaci Peterson vs Evelyn Nolan / Katie Brand6-0, 6-0
2025-07-15vs EspositoLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Kathryn Powell vs Kelly Young / Jennifer Donaghue6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Green / Julia La Vay vs Nina Schou / Jenny Kehoe0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmrita Rai / Melissa Sullivan Greissing vs Nancy Lao / Tamara Kucik3-6, 6-7
2025-07-11vs CorneliusWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Doyle / Skye Replogle vs Margaret Cornelius / Kerith Eckart6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJaci Peterson / Samantha Brown vs Jocelyn Lin / Chenchen Feng6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt vs Bonnie Skafte / Sara Zalowitz6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Jaci Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Skye Replogle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Carina Bartozzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Alexandra Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Chandler Carr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Suzanne Kimpel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Stephanie van Pelt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Kathryn Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Alison Wager
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anne Kline
published 3
2.74
Emily Warke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Julia La Vay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Anne-Marie Coakley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
kathleen kennedy
published
Amrita Rai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Melissa Sullivan Greissing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Wager + Suzanne Kimpel7555% games+14.6% vs expected
Alison Wager + Jaci Peterson303 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Doyle + Chandler Carr213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaci Peterson
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Skye Replogle
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Carina Bartozzi
11W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Alexandra Doyle
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Chandler Carr
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Suzanne Kimpel
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Stephanie van Pelt
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kathryn Powell
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Alison Wager
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Anne Kline
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Warke
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74
Julia La Vay
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Anne-Marie Coakley
5W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
kathleen kennedy
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amrita Rai
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Sullivan Greissing
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.