Teams

KWahr (Carmel)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-06vs MSchrimsher (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Lauren Mulligan vs Jenny Merlo / Louisa Jones5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Starling / Kim Walters vs Ruth Shaffner / Rebecca Klepser1-6, 4-6
2025-04-24vs SPierle (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Yancey vs Kim Wojnowich5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-04vs MKleber/LGrant (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMolly Morris / Meredith Starling vs Stephanie Meadow / Veronica Schaeffer2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Lauren Mulligan vs Breck Lindley / Elizabeth Golden6-3, 7-6
2025-03-28vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Morris / Amy Yancey vs Annaliese Anderson / Ashley Emison1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Starling / Jenn Mattscheck vs Annie Christie / Tracy Jenkins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-14vs TYoung (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMeredith Starling vs Allison Abbott3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Lauren Mulligan vs Spencer Blythe / Lauren Roberts2-6, 6-7
2025-03-07vs LAndersen/TRichardson (Chestnut)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAmy Yancey vs Dana Holloman4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJenn Mattscheck / Meredith Starling vs Lori Andersen / Teri Snoke6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lauren Mulligan
published
3.36
Kristine Wahr
published
3.33
Amy Yancey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Molly Morris
published
3.12
Tina Christensen
published
3.11
Jenn Mattscheck
published
2.98
Meredith Starling
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Sheri Sayman
published
Kim Walters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Morris + Kristine Wahr314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mulligan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Kristine Wahr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Amy Yancey
52W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Molly Morris
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Tina Christensen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jenn Mattscheck
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Meredith Starling
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Sheri Sayman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Kim Walters
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.