Teams

GR - Taylor

Tri-Level 55 & Over · Womens 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-29vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Taylor / Susan Elmore vs Michele Mayo / Catherine Land2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDarlene Worthington / Susan Johnson vs Diane Pons / Monica Carlson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Rosin / MARY WATKINS vs Nicole Carlyle / Cari Autry2-6, 0-6
2026-07-28vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Rosin / MARY WATKINS vs Lori Wagner / Cari Autry1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Temple / Terry Ray vs Azita Movahed / Linda Roberson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarol Taylor / Sherry Smith vs Catherine Land / Suzan Martin6-3, 6-4
2026-07-19vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Taylor / Susan Elmore vs Catherine Land / Michele Mayo7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerry Ray / Susan Johnson vs Azita Movahed / Linda Roberson6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Abbott / MARY WATKINS vs Lori Wagner / Cari Autry2-6, 2-6
2026-06-28vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Susan Elmore vs Michele Mayo / Monica Carlson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSusan Johnson / Terry Ray vs Azita Movahed / Kimberly Kuhn6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Nimmo / MARY WATKINS vs Lori Wagner / Nicole Carlyle4-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Elmore / Sheryletta Lacewell vs Catherine Land / Monica Carlson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDarlene Worthington / Paige Temple vs Diane Pons / Kimberly Kuhn2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Nimmo / Christine Rosin vs Nicole Carlyle / Linda Roberson1-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs GCC - Pons/CarlsonLost 02
L#2 DoublesDarlene Worthington / Paige Temple vs Diane Pons / Azita Movahed6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Abbott / Christine Rosin vs Lori Wagner / Linda Roberson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Womens 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GCC - Pons/Carlson4212614140
2GR - Taylor2461227198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sheryletta Lacewell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Susan Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Terry Ray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carol Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Darlene Worthington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Paige Temple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Mary Jo Nimmo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Christine Rosin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Rhonda Abbott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
MARY WATKINS
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darlene Worthington + Paige Temple044 matchesnot enough data
MARY WATKINS + Rhonda Abbott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheryletta Lacewell
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Susan Elmore
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Terry Ray
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Carol Taylor
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Darlene Worthington
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Mary Jo Nimmo
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Christine Rosin
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Rhonda Abbott
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
MARY WATKINS
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Susan Harrison
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.