Teams

Innisbrook

2024 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-22Split 11
L#1 SinglesDonna Denhof vs Erin Chenderlin0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Schmitt / Caron Hobson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-15vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLoretta Bruney / Donna Denhof vs Jennifer Gibson / Kymberlee Olson7-6, 6-0
2024-06-01vs Tarpon HellmersWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaron Hobson / Theresa Whiddon vs Sherrie Bourgeois / Ellen Hellmers6-4, 6-3
2024-05-18vs Seminole Smash GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Signoracci / Mary Schmitt vs Caroline Stupple / Jayne Lewis6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-13vs Ardea HueholtWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheri Couch / Mary Schmitt vs Gail Stallwood / Kathleen Annichiarico3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Whiddon / Donna Denhof vs Karen Braudis / Teresa Orr4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-11vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmily Signoracci / Mary Schmitt vs Joan Whitten / Natalie Hensgen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Denhof / Lauren Robertson vs Esthela Gonzalez / Moise Carrington6-0, 6-2
2024-04-13vs Belleair Fresh PrincessesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Denhof / Caron Hobson vs Svetlana Sidorova / Karen Fischer5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Emily Signoracci
published
3.37
Mona Patel
published
3.37
Elise Hall
published
3.31
Sheri Couch
published
3.24
Donna Denhof
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.09
Theresa Whiddon
published
3.08
Mary Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Caron Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elise Hall + Emily Signoracci10266% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Couch + Elise Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Mona Patel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Elise Hall
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sheri Couch
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Donna Denhof
26W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Theresa Whiddon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Mary Schmitt
65W–151L career · 4 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Caron Hobson
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Monica Perez de Lara
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.