Teams

Inverness C. Club - Ryals

2026 B'ham Combo - 18 & Over Women Weekday · 2.5 Tuesday Morning

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-25vs Old Overton - MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Kelsey Henley vs Michelle Johnson / Sara Eley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Prickett / Catherine Wilkes vs Lauren Sullivan / Amber Terakedis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRegan Wilson / Allison Horton vs Amy Henderson / Amy Uffinger5-7, 3-6
2026-08-24vs VCC - SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Bailey Fleming vs Katie Newell / Maggie Klyce1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeannette Martin / Sheri Hulsey vs Catherine Townes / Elizabeth Gray0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Mccorkle / Catherine Wilkes vs Allison Chapman / Meredith D'Amico0-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs West Homewood - HirschyWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheri Hulsey / Lauren Sisler vs Anna Boney / Carrie Hawkins3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Laurie Russell vs Meredith Husnik / Grace Ann Cink3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBailey Fleming / Regan Wilson vs Heather Alexander / Catherine Walton7-5, 7-6
2026-08-11vs PRC - HeydingerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Kristin Prickett vs Sandy Trujillo / Barbara Ashman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRegan Wilson / Bailey Fleming vs Patricia Patel / Alina Olteanu6-1, 7-6
2026-08-07vs Old Overton - MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Laurie Russell vs Heather Harden / Michelle Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeannette Martin / Emily Tucker vs Jamie Miller / Rebecca Swann3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRegan Wilson / Bailey Fleming vs Kirsten Gantzhorn / Amanda Carter7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs VCC - SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ryals / Kelsey Henley vs Catherine Townes / Maggie Klyce7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren Sisler / Laurie Russell vs Elizabeth Gray / Lindsay Hayes3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Mccorkle / Regan Wilson vs Abbey Ginter / Karlie Wilson3-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs PRC - HeydingerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Prickett / Carmen Ryals vs Brenda Joffe / Jessica VanLandingham7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaurie Russell / Lauren Sisler vs Katie Brodhead / Patricia Patel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllison Horton / Emily Tucker vs Miranda Chappell / Sandy Trujillo4-6, 3-6
2026-07-07vs West Homewood - HirschySplit 11
L#2 DoublesEmily Tucker / Sheri Hulsey vs Carrie Hawkins / Kate Hiden0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBailey Fleming / Regan Wilson vs Heather Alexander / Catherine Walton3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Tuesday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Carmen Ryals
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.49
Kristin Prickett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Kelsey Henley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Bailey Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.39
Lauren Sisler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Sheri Hulsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.26
Laurie Russell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Allison Horton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brittany Mccorkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Catherine Wilkes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Emily Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Regan Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.06
Jeannette Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Chelsea Martin
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Russell + Carmen Ryals3260% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Prickett + Carmen Ryals314 matchesnot enough data
Bailey Fleming + Regan Wilson314 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Martin + Emily Tucker033 matchesnot enough data
Chelsea Martin + Bailey Fleming033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carmen Ryals
13W–8L career · type S · 10 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
Kristin Prickett
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Kelsey Henley
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Bailey Fleming
8W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
Lauren Sisler
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Sheri Hulsey
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Laurie Russell
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Allison Horton
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brittany Mccorkle
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Catherine Wilkes
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Tucker
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Regan Wilson
4W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jeannette Martin
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Chelsea Martin
2W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.