Teams

FICI 8.0 40+

2021 Frederick County Mixed 40 & Over · Frederick County Adult 40 & Over Mixed 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-14vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Michael Erdely vs Christopher Lee / Wendy Heger1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoseph Bahorich / Jennifer McCarron vs Luis Lozano / Jessica Lee2-6, 4-6
2021-07-12vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhillip Harvin / Jennifer McCarron vs Shelena Sanderson / Don Barry0-6, 1-6
2021-07-08vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Bahorich / Kimberly Wells vs Christopher Lee / Wendy Heger3-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Wells / Phillip Harvin vs Juan Jose Tijero / Erin Newsome Moltz3-6, 4-6
2021-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Erdely / Michael Erdely vs Sharon Walsh / David French2-6, 3-6
2021-07-01vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJasen Fici / Holly Erdely vs Juan Jose Tijero / Samantha Gass2-6, 3-6
2021-06-28vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer McCarron / Joseph Bahorich vs Todd Woolpert / Maria Woolpert4-6, 5-7
2021-06-14vs CADY 8.0 40+ FREDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Giselle Medina vs Justin Cady / Christina Truax4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer McCarron / Phillip Harvin vs Shelena Sanderson / David French0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick County Adult 40 & Over Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Charles Sellers
published 4.5
3.94
Jasen Fici
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.72
Michael Erdely
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Kimberly Wells
published
3.59
Joseph Bahorich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
published
3.15
Phillip Harvin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.11
Giselle Medina
published 3.5
3.08
Holly Erdely
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Erdely + Holly Erdely121946% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Sellers
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Jasen Fici
102W–226L career · 6 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Michael Erdely
206W–160L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Kimberly Wells
7W–18L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Joseph Bahorich
195W–158L career · 3 lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.59
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Phillip Harvin
144W–211L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Holly Erdely
78W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.