Teams

Gulf Coast - Savoy

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over-GC · Women 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gulf Coast - Savoy000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christi Foil
published 4.5
Courtney Ulrich
published 4.5
Jan Estrada
published 4.5
3.99
Heidi St. Amant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Danna Day
published 4
3.88
Amanda Letonoff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Nicole Montagnet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.73
Mary Ann Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Angie Simmons
published 4
Melanie Billman
published
Michelle Foley
published
Michelle Savoy
published
Shelby Harriel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann Strickland + Nicole Montagnet6158% games+4.0% vs expected
Mary Ann Strickland + Michelle Savoy6752% games−6.3% vs expected
Michelle Savoy + Nicole Montagnet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Foil
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Courtney Ulrich
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jan Estrada
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Heidi St. Amant
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Danna Day
42W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Amanda Letonoff
63W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Nicole Montagnet
52W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Mary Ann Strickland
26W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Angie Simmons
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Melanie Billman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Foley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Savoy
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Harriel
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.