Teams

Hathaway-CoCo Puffs

2024 One Doubles-Summer · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-11vs Massry-CanterwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawli Hathaway / Beshka Lewis vs Dania Massry / Jennifer Ivester6-3, 6-4
2024-08-01vs Washington AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeshka Lewis / CRYSTAL LEE - (DQ)* vs Uyen Lee / Kristi Gonzalez6-4, 6-4
2024-07-27vs Herrick-Fast ForwardLost 01
L#1 DoublesShawli Hathaway / Coco Hernandez-Tagoe vs Debra Moody / Becka Parker3-6, 2-6
2024-07-23vs ShanleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawli Hathaway / Beshka Lewis vs Yi Zhao / Kathi McKay6-3, 6-4
2024-07-18vs HulburtWon 10
W#1 DoublesCRYSTAL LEE - (DQ)* / Coco Hernandez-Tagoe vs Megan Dempsey / Charae Hulburt6-0, 6-3
2024-07-02vs Abrams-Acing GracefullyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCoco Hernandez-Tagoe / CRYSTAL LEE - (DQ)* vs Marcy Duenhoelter / Leah Knight6-2, 6-3
2024-06-09vs Saul/Clerget-Oly GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCoco Hernandez-Tagoe / Beshka Lewis vs Holly Brazel / Barbara Lucenko6-1, 6-0
2024-06-05vs Neeley/LarsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawli Hathaway / CRYSTAL LEE - (DQ)* vs Lori Neeley / Annamarie Larson7-5, 7-6
2024-05-28vs Waldman-In SyncWon 10
W#1 DoublesCoco Hernandez-Tagoe / CRYSTAL LEE - (DQ)* vs Heidi Murdock / Leslie Waldman6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fuller/Riippi-Thumbs up9191250
2SWW-Manke9191462
3Dizon-Doubles Trouble7373772
4Hulburt7373980
5Herrick-Fast Forward73731094
6Neeley/Larson64641088
7Washington Aces64641187
8Clarke/Hewitt-Rowley Sisters55551181
9Massry-Canterwood55551185
10Waldman-In Sync55551187
11Memmott - KaPOW!55551289
12Slater-Oly55551287
13Abrams-Acing Gracefully55551492
14Norris46461297
15Shanley46461497
16Cadiz/Crosby-Whasian Invasian35351084
17Hunter35351291
18McLaughlin/O'Halloran36361388
19Steuart-Summer Smash36361499
20Hathaway-CoCo Puffs37371499
21Saul/Clerget-Oly Girls282816111
22Smith191918119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Coco Hernandez-Tagoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
CRYSTAL LEE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Beshka Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.15
Shawli Hathaway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Coco Hernandez-Tagoe + Beshka Lewis7160% games+8.9% vs expected
CRYSTAL LEE + Coco Hernandez-Tagoe314 matchesnot enough data
Shawli Hathaway + Coco Hernandez-Tagoe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Coco Hernandez-Tagoe
50W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
CRYSTAL LEE
11W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Beshka Lewis
114W–42L career · 12 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Shawli Hathaway
98W–136L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.