Teams

Rockledge - Donovan

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-23vs Brevard/Addagarla/18&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Rothe / Brent Mitchell vs David Castillo / Rohit Menghani1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNuno Montenegro vs Ashish Dalal6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Donovan / Jay Amburgey vs Cameron Hartnett / Grant Wells1-6
L#3 DoublesShawn Coleman / Jamin Campbell vs Callum Tulloch / David Tran0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-17vs Brevard/Addagarla/18&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesJay Amburgey / Don White vs David Castillo / Joey Shine1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNuno Montenegro vs Eric Billhartz6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Donovan / Shawn Coleman vs Cameron Hartnett / David Tran0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCameron Stahl / Jamin Campbell vs Rohit Menghani / Hart Arnold5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Peter Aude
published
3.32
John Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
James Rothe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jay Amburgey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Jamin Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Hong Choing
published
3.10
Don White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Brent Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Cameron Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Nuno Montenegro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Zach Dahl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don White + Jay Amburgey3448% games+1.0% vs expected
John Donovan + Jay Amburgey314 matchesnot enough data
Don White + John Donovan303 matchesnot enough data
Brent Mitchell + Peter Aude303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Aude
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
John Donovan
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
James Rothe
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jay Amburgey
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Jamin Campbell
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Hong Choing
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Don White
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Brent Mitchell
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cameron Stahl
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Nuno Montenegro
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Dahl
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.