Teams

Edwardson/Dutta

2021 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-04vs Parker- Baseline AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesKoushik Dutta / Daniel Edwardson vs Andrew Morley / Kurtis Fechtmeyer6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Huck / Alejandro Trevino vs Chris Parker / Gregg Sivesind6-3, 6-2
2021-03-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Daniel Ryan vs Troy Schuller / Mark Nehring6-4, 6-4
2021-03-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Phillip Chase vs Ashish Kumar Singh / Thomas Stefaniak6-2, 6-3
2021-03-15vs Bogen Winter '21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKoushik Dutta / Daniel Edwardson vs Sam Barnes / Paul Bennett2-6, 3-6
2021-03-08vs Fling MatchpointSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniel Edwardson / Stephen Huck vs Nicholas Lim / Tom Larson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Daniel Ryan vs Robert Malecki / Andrew Miskella5-7, 3-6
2021-03-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Ryan / Alejandro Trevino vs Luke Anderson / Fola Ogundipe4-6, 6-7
2021-02-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Daniel Ryan vs Steven Bauer / James Duboulay6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
3.97
Eran Singer
published 4
3.84
KJ Lynch
published
3.82
Paul Schoenecker
published
3.80
Koushik Dutta
published
3.39
Daniel Edwardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Nik Larsen
published
Stephen Huck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koushik Dutta + Phillip Chase404 matchesnot enough data
Paul Schoenecker + Eran Singer224 matchesnot enough data
Koushik Dutta + Paul Schoenecker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Eran Singer
41W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
KJ Lynch
31W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Paul Schoenecker
45W–34L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Koushik Dutta
45W–28L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Daniel Edwardson
99W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Nik Larsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Huck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.