Teams

ETC:Pink Rally Club:OLeary/Martin

2025 WMA Tri-Level Spring (2025) · 3.0 Women 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs LTC:GTP:Terrinca/JordanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Baskin / Stephanie O'Leary vs Eileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca6-7, 1-4
2025-07-09vs ETC:SpinHeads:RakasLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie O'Leary / Madeleine Martin vs Margaret Rakas / Allison Cheney2-6, 3-6
2025-07-09vs ETC:Alley Cats: MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Baskin / Emma Plaut vs Dena Przybyl / Megan Scully6-4, 6-5
2025-07-01vs ETC:SpinHeads:RakasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Baskin / Amy Anderlonis vs Kristen Dygon / Mika Inoue3-6, 1-6
2025-06-06vs ETC:Between the Lines:GrocottLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmma Plaut / Catherine Landry vs Cassandra Crowal / Liz Bone6-7, 2-3
2025-05-29vs ETC:Between the Lines:GrocottLost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Martin / Amy Anderlonis vs Elaine Grocott / Jean Peretti4-6, 1-6
2025-05-13vs ETC:Alley Cats: MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Landry / Stephanie O'Leary vs Mina Martin / Megan Scully4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Between the Lines:Grocott8080462
2ETC:SpinHeads:Rakas6262444
3LTC:GTP:Terrinca/Jordan25251168
4ETC:Pink Rally Club:OLeary/Martin25251175
5ETC:Alley Cats: Martin17171584

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Madeleine Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Stephanie O'Leary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Joy Baskin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Emma Plaut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Anderlonis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Catherine Landry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Landry + Emma Plaut6170% games+9.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madeleine Martin
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Stephanie O'Leary
40W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Joy Baskin
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Emma Plaut
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amy Anderlonis
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Catherine Landry
30W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.