Teams

TPerrone.40C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Oct 6 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
2026-09-01vs LEdgar.40C-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Howard / Sara Velarde vs Terri Tarrant / Alyse Levine6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacy Rank / Terry Perrone vs Lisa Watkins / Lynn Edgar7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMiranda Harmon / Angela Baxley vs Heidi Lanford / Frances Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-25vs LBible.40.7.5C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Williams / Traci Brooks vs Cary Armstrong / Loralie Bible4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Rank / Michelle Then vs Anne Confer / Lorraine Hall6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMeghan Howard / Ann Skvarcius vs Judy Faubert / Sarah Motsinger1-6, 6-7
2026-08-18vs JBarrow.7.5C-HRWon 21
W#1 DoublesMiranda Harmon / Sara Velarde vs Jennifer Barrow / Donna Ware6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeidi Ross / Kelli Harris vs Lindsay Stanek / Alexandra Millholland2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmber Oberle / Meghan Howard vs Denise Olson / Gayathri Rajaraman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHerndon-CHTC1030115
2TPerrone.40C-DUR1021223
3KLaan.40.7.5C-DUR1021227
4LBible.40.7.5C-DUR0112427
5JBarrow.7.5C-HR0112431
6LEdgar.40C-UNC0103633

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Stacy Rank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Leah Weinberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Meghan Howard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Michelle Then
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Miranda Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Lisa Buyaki
published 4
3.64
Heidi Ross
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Jane Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Ann Skvarcius
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Terry Perrone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Amber Oberle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Sara Velarde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Traci Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Kelli Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Angela Baxley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Rank + Meghan Howard6162% games−3.7% vs expected
Angela Baxley + Traci Brooks3537% games−13.4% vs expected
Angela Baxley + Leah Weinberger10551% gamesnot enough data
Terry Perrone + Leah Weinberger5748% gamesnot enough data
Sara Velarde + Leah Weinberger5260% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Buyaki + Jane Williams4359% gamesnot enough data
Sara Velarde + Terry Perrone2442% gamesnot enough data
Jane Williams + Terry Perrone1453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacy Rank
283W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Leah Weinberger
357W–281L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Michelle Then
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Lisa Buyaki
145W–111L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Jane Williams
306W–299L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Ann Skvarcius
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Terry Perrone
403W–263L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Amber Oberle
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Sara Velarde
134W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Traci Brooks
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Kelli Harris
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Angela Baxley
290W–178L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.